Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAGX vs GFAFX
AMAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AMAGX vs GFAFX
AMAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAGX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AMAGX (6.7B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AMAGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AMAGX (0.00). AMAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AMAGX (32 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). AMAGX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMAGX (3.00). AMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: AMAGX (100) vs GFAFX (250). AMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.00 vs. GFAFX (4.25). AMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 60.77 vs. GFAFX (15.72).
| AMAGX | GFAFX | AMAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.65 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.65 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.594 | 7.134 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.00 | 4.25 | 611% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.75 | 39.15 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.77 | 15.72 | 386% |
| Returns for 10 years | 218.42 | 102.45 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement