Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAGX vs GFAFX
AMAGX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts AMAGX vs GFAFX
AMAGX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAGX vs. GFAFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAGX is a Hold and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. AMAGX (6.69B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than AMAGX: GFAFX (0.20) vs AMAGX (0.00). AMAGX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: AMAGX (33 years) vs GFAFX (26 years). AMAGX (0.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMAGX (12.00). AMAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: AMAGX (100) vs GFAFX (250). AMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.41 vs. GFAFX (2.11). AMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 53.50 vs. GFAFX (13.27).
| AMAGX | GFAFX | AMAGX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.65 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.65 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.727 | 9.847 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.69B | 342B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.41 | 2.11 | 1,014% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.14 | 44.14 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.50 | 13.27 | 403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 228.10 | 107.33 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers