Advertisement
AMAL vs CBGPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Hold and CBGPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBGPY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AMAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CBGPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBGPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CBGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.57% price change this week, while CBGPY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.93% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| AMAL | CBGPY | AMAL / CBGPY | |
| Capitalization | 830M | 819M | 101% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.585 | 88.376 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.35 | 5.58 | 150% |
| Revenue | 321M | 769M | 42% |
| Total Cash | 4.05M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 90.9M | 2.19B | 4% |
AMAL | CBGPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBGPY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAL (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBGPY (100) in the null industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBGPY’s over the last 12 months.
CBGPY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as AMAL (20) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
CBGPY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as AMAL (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
CBGPY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAL (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CBGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMAL’s over the last 12 months.
| AMAL | CBGPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 67% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
AMAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with OSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then OSBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAL | 100% | +2.63% | ||
| OSBC - AMAL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| INDB - AMAL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| FULT - AMAL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| BY - AMAL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| ASB - AMAL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
CBGPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBGPY and LYG have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBGPY and LYG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBGPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBGPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| LYG - CBGPY | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ADBKF - CBGPY | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PBAM - CBGPY | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| NEFB - CBGPY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMAL - CBGPY | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||