AMAL
Price
$50.00
Change
+$0.62 (+1.26%)
Updated
Aug 3, 11:05 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.48B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$24.33
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
4.66B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAL vs FULT

AMAL vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. FULT commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Buy and FULT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAL: $49.38 vs. FULT: $24.33)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 51% vs. FULT: 58%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $1.48B vs. FULT: $4.66B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.48B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than AMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.93% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.66B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($1.48B). AMAL has higher P/E ratio than FULT: AMAL (13.17) vs FULT (11.70). AMAL YTD gains are higher at: 55.474 vs. FULT (28.058). FULT has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. AMAL (4.5M). AMAL has less debt than FULT: AMAL (81.1M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than AMAL: FULT (1.33B) vs AMAL (344M).
AMALFULTAMAL / FULT
Capitalization1.48B4.66B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD55.47428.058198%
P/E Ratio13.1711.70113%
Revenue344M1.33B26%
Total Cash4.5M312M1%
Total Debt81.1M1.25B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1133
SMR RATING
1..100
4424
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1738
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMAL (78). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (33). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (44). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (43). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (38). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSSD25.050.04
+0.16%
Cohen & Steers Sh Dur Pref & Inc Act ETF
EMHY40.230.04
+0.10%
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF
IBID25.72-0.01
-0.02%
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term Tips ETF
SMCF40.33-0.09
-0.22%
Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF
ESGD104.70-0.64
-0.61%
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF

FULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULT has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FULT jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FULT
1D Price
Change %
FULT100%
-0.04%
ASB - FULT
90%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
ONB - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
UBSI - FULT
89%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
UCB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
AUB - FULT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
More