AMAT vs ASML
ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) are technology companies which serve the needs of semiconductor chip manufacturers with specialized equipment and diagnostic tools. ASML is based in the Netherlands while AMAT is based in California, but both maintain a significant global presence. ASML is the larger of the two, with an enterprise value of $353B compared to AMAT’s EV of $121B. ASML’s core products are lithography and metrology equipment designed for chip manufacturers. AMAT offers a wide array of products and services to chip manufacturers, and also has a displays segment which creates products for use in the manufacture of LED and OLED display screens for telephones, computers, and televisions. AMAT’s ROE appears stronger as of this writing, at 49%, against ASML’s 38%. AMAT also just experienced a quarterly earnings growth (yoy) over 100%, but ASML’s is also commendable at 38%.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileASML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ASML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASML’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ASML’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMAT (@Semiconductors) experienced а -3.40% price change this week, while ASML (@Semiconductors) price change was -1.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMAT is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
ASML is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (-3.04% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| AMAT | ASML | AMAT / ASML | |
| Capitalization | 173B | 380B | 46% |
| EBITDA | 8.78B | 9.98B | 88% |
| Gain YTD | 1.726 | -6.016 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.55 | 46.18 | 53% |
| Revenue | 26.5B | 27.6B | 96% |
| Total Cash | 7.49B | 7.01B | 107% |
| Total Debt | 5.99B | 4.63B | 129% |
AMAT | ASML | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMAT's Valuation (35) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASML (77). This means that AMAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASML’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (35). This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's SMR Rating (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (21). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as AMAT (62). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (69). This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
| AMAT | ASML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
AMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAT has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAT jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMAT | 100% | +1.33% | ||
| LRCX - AMAT | 94% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| KLAC - AMAT | 93% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| VECO - AMAT | 82% Closely correlated | -2.72% | ||
| ONTO - AMAT | 82% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| UCTT - AMAT | 78% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
ASML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASML has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASML jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASML | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| KLAC - ASML | 86% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| ASMLF - ASML | 85% Closely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| AMAT - ASML | 84% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| LRCX - ASML | 84% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| ASMIY - ASML | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||