Advertisement
AMAT vs INTC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Applied Materials (AMAT) vs. Intel (INTC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both AMAT and INTC operate in the semiconductor industry but serve distinct roles: AMAT supplies manufacturing equipment while INTC designs and produces chips.
- Recent market activity shows AMAT benefiting from sustained demand in advanced process technologies, contributing to relatively steadier performance trends compared to INTC.
- INTC continues to navigate foundry expansion and product roadmap execution amid broader industry capacity adjustments.
- Sector exposure to artificial intelligence and high-performance computing remains a shared growth driver, though execution timelines and capital intensity differ.
- Market sentiment reflects ongoing evaluation of supply-chain resilience and technological competitiveness for both companies.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between equipment-provider stability and integrated-device-manufacturer innovation cycles.
Introduction
This comparison examines Applied Materials (AMAT) and Intel (INTC), two established semiconductor-sector participants with complementary yet distinct business models. The analysis focuses on observable market dynamics, recent performance patterns, and positioning factors that institutional and retail investors monitor when evaluating exposure within the technology hardware space. Traders and longer-term investors seeking to understand relative momentum, risk profiles, and sector-specific catalysts may find this side-by-side review useful for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions.
AMAT Overview and Recent Performance
Applied Materials provides equipment, services, and software used in semiconductor wafer fabrication. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected continued investment in leading-edge nodes and specialty technologies. Market activity indicates steady order visibility tied to customer capacity expansions, supporting relatively consistent trading ranges amid broader semiconductor volatility. Sentiment has been shaped by ongoing global demand for advanced packaging and materials engineering solutions, with performance influenced by capital-spending cycles at major foundries and integrated device manufacturers.
INTC Overview and Recent Performance
Intel designs and manufactures microprocessors, memory, and related components while expanding its foundry services. Recent market activity shows the company addressing process-technology transitions and external manufacturing partnerships. Stock behavior has been influenced by product roadmap updates and capital-allocation priorities, resulting in more variable price movements compared with equipment peers. Sentiment reflects investor focus on execution milestones in high-volume manufacturing and competitive positioning within central processing units and artificial-intelligence accelerators.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a much larger library that spans thousands of tickers. Hundreds of bots are available across diverse strategies, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics; only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions appear in the trending section. Available bots display varying win rates, profit factors, maximum drawdowns, and trade frequencies, allowing users to review detailed back-tested and live metrics before deployment. The platform supports multiple trading styles, from short-term momentum approaches to longer-horizon trend-following systems. Explore the curated selection at Trending AI Robots to identify bots suited to current conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Applied Materials operates primarily as an equipment and materials supplier, generating revenue through sales and service contracts tied to customer fab utilization rates. Intel functions as an integrated device manufacturer with significant internal production capacity and growing foundry ambitions. Growth drivers for AMAT center on technology node transitions and specialty process tools, while INTC emphasizes chip design leadership and manufacturing scale. Recent momentum has favored equipment providers amid sustained capital expenditures, whereas integrated manufacturers face additional execution and margin pressures. Risk factors include cyclical demand for AMAT and technology roadmap or competitive challenges for INTC. Both maintain exposure to artificial intelligence and high-performance computing, yet their supply-chain roles create differing sensitivities to industry capacity utilization and geopolitical factors.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability in order visibility, and positioning within capital-equipment demand cycles, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to AMAT versus INTC. This assessment incorporates recent performance patterns and sector catalyst alignment without implying certainty or future outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAT is a Hold and INTC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMAT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileINTC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- INTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INTC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- INTC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMAT (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while INTC (@Semiconductors) price change was +3.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +3.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
INTC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (+4.47% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+3.43% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| AMAT | INTC | AMAT / INTC | |
| Capitalization | 447B | 504B | 89% |
| EBITDA | 11.1B | 11.4B | 97% |
| Gain YTD | 119.543 | 171.626 | 70% |
| P/E Ratio | 52.94 | 904.17 | 6% |
| Revenue | 29B | 53.8B | 54% |
| Total Cash | 8.24B | 32.8B | 25% |
| Total Debt | 7.27B | 45B | 16% |
AMAT | INTC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 24 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMAT's Valuation (78) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as INTC (97) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as INTC (45) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's SMR Rating (24) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (93) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
INTC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as AMAT (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that INTC’s stock grew similarly to AMAT’s over the last 12 months.
AMAT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (79) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that AMAT’s stock grew significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
| AMAT | INTC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
Advertisement
INTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 100% | -2.33% | ||
| LRCX - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| AMAT - INTC | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| KLIC - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| FORM - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| CEVA - INTC | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||