Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMBFX vs RLBGX
AMBFX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts AMBFX vs RLBGX
AMBFX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMBFX vs. RLBGX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBFX is a Hold and RLBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBFX (285B) and RLBGX (285B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLBGX (2.08) and AMBFX (1.99) have matching dividends . AMBFX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: AMBFX (18 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). AMBFX (0.35) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). AMBFX (50.00) and RLBGX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. AMBFX (250) and RLBGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. AMBFX (7.97). RLBGX (34.08) and AMBFX (33.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AMBFX | RLBGX | AMBFX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.25 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.25 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.206 | 9.280 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 285B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 8.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.92 | 43.74 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.48 | 34.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.12 | 89.01 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement