AMBP
Price
$4.90
Change
-$0.03 (-0.61%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.93B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CCK
Price
$111.79
Change
-$1.44 (-1.27%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
12.16B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBP vs CCK

AMBP vs CCK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. CCK commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Buy and CCK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (AMBP: $4.90 vs. CCK: $111.79)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and CCK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 73% vs. CCK: 124%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.93B vs. CCK: $12.16B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.93B. CCK’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $12.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $6.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCCK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CCK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMBP and CCK are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CCK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMBP is a better buy in the short-term than CCK.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -3.54% price change this week, while CCK (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -4.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

CCK is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.53% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCK($12.2B) has a higher market cap than AMBP($2.93B). AMBP has higher P/E ratio than CCK: AMBP (98.00) vs CCK (16.08). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: 25.428 vs. CCK (9.621). CCK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.1B vs. AMBP (717M). CCK has more cash in the bank: 656M vs. AMBP (189M). AMBP has less debt than CCK: AMBP (4.34B) vs CCK (6.27B). CCK has higher revenues than AMBP: CCK (13.3B) vs AMBP (5.99B).
AMBPCCKAMBP / CCK
Capitalization2.93B12.2B24%
EBITDA717M2.1B34%
Gain YTD25.4289.621264%
P/E Ratio98.0016.08609%
Revenue5.99B13.3B45%
Total Cash189M656M29%
Total Debt4.34B6.27B69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCK: Fundamental Ratings
CCK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPCCK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
AMBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CCK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JZXN1.160.01
+0.87%
Jiuzi Holdings Inc.
ERIE243.830.48
+0.20%
Erie Indemnity Company
HIMX13.95-0.17
-1.20%
Himax Technologies
PRTA9.30-0.24
-2.52%
Prothena Corp
USIO2.57-0.17
-6.20%
Usio

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
-0.61%
CCK - AMBP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
AMCR - AMBP
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
BALL - AMBP
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
SLGN - AMBP
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
AVY - AMBP
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More

CCK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCK has been closely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCK jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCK
1D Price
Change %
CCK100%
-1.27%
BALL - CCK
67%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
SLGN - CCK
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
GEF - CCK
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
AMCR - CCK
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
AVY - CCK
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
More