AMBP
Price
$3.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.05B
62 days until earnings call
CCK
Price
$98.37
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
9.58B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBP vs CCK

Header iconAMBP vs CCK Comparison
Open Charts AMBP vs CCKBanner chart's image
Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
Price$3.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.63K
Capitalization2.05B
Crown Holdings
Price$98.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.42K
Capitalization9.58B
AMBP vs CCK Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. CCK commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Buy and CCK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBP: $3.78 vs. CCK: $98.37)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and CCK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 1% vs. CCK: 0%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.05B vs. CCK: $9.58B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.05B. CCK’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $9.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBP is a better buy in the long-term than CCK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CCK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCK is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while CCK (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

CCK is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.28% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCK($9.58B) has a higher market cap than AMBP($2.05B). AMBP has higher P/E ratio than CCK: AMBP (40.65) vs CCK (21.09). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: 33.955 vs. CCK (19.618). CCK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.73B vs. AMBP (508M). CCK has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. AMBP (434M). AMBP has less debt than CCK: AMBP (3.73B) vs CCK (7.7B). CCK has higher revenues than AMBP: CCK (12B) vs AMBP (4.81B).
AMBPCCKAMBP / CCK
Capitalization2.05B9.58B21%
EBITDA508M1.73B29%
Gain YTD33.95519.618173%
P/E Ratio40.6521.09193%
Revenue4.81B12B40%
Total Cash434M1.31B33%
Total Debt3.73B7.7B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCK: Fundamental Ratings
CCK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
67
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPCCK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CCK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPHQ69.59N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500® Quality ETF
LEXI30.91N/A
N/A
Alexis Practical Tactical ETF
BBEM55.57N/A
N/A
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Mkt EqETF
SAA20.31-0.03
-0.12%
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
FXG63.05-0.59
-0.93%
First Trust Cnsmr Staples AlphaDEX® ETF

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
N/A
BALL - AMBP
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCK - AMBP
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OI - AMBP
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AVY - AMBP
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BERY - AMBP
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

CCK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCK has been closely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCK jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCK
1D Price
Change %
CCK100%
N/A
BALL - CCK
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
TRS - CCK
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OI - CCK
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SON - CCK
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
PKG - CCK
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More