AMBP
Price
$3.06
Change
+$0.04 (+1.32%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
59 days until earnings call
DSS
Price
$0.81
Change
-$0.02 (-2.41%)
Updated
Dec 23, 11:30 AM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

AMBP vs DSS

Header iconAMBP vs DSS Comparison
Open Charts AMBP vs DSSBanner chart's image
Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
Price$3.06
Change+$0.04 (+1.32%)
Volume$31.6K
CapitalizationN/A
DSS
Price$0.81
Change-$0.02 (-2.41%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AMBP vs DSS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. DSS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Hold and DSS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (AMBP: $3.06 vs. DSS: $0.83)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and DSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 131% vs. DSS: 174%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.05B vs. DSS: $12.69M
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.05B. DSS’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $12.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDSS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DSS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AMBP and DSS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DSS is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while DSS (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -19.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -4.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

DSS is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-4.35% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMBP($2.05B) has a higher market cap than DSS($12.7M). AMBP has higher P/E ratio than DSS: AMBP (40.65) vs DSS (1.01). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: -10.957 vs. DSS (-65.525). AMBP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 508M vs. DSS (-72.39M). AMBP has more cash in the bank: 434M vs. DSS (6.9M). DSS has less debt than AMBP: DSS (62.2M) vs AMBP (3.73B). AMBP has higher revenues than DSS: AMBP (4.81B) vs DSS (34.6M).
AMBPDSSAMBP / DSS
Capitalization2.05B12.7M16,142%
EBITDA508M-72.39M-702%
Gain YTD-10.957-65.52517%
P/E Ratio40.651.014,020%
Revenue4.81B34.6M13,908%
Total Cash434M6.9M6,293%
Total Debt3.73B62.2M6,003%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DSS: Fundamental Ratings
DSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPDSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MWOJX62.720.60
+0.97%
MFS Global Growth R4
QGRPX17.390.15
+0.87%
UBS US Quality Growth At Rsnbl Prc P
RMBMX12.490.09
+0.73%
RMB SMID Cap I
RNGGX62.270.44
+0.71%
American Funds New Economy R6
COSSX10.360.01
+0.10%
Columbia Overseas Value Inst2

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
+0.99%
CCK - AMBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
BALL - AMBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
PTVE - AMBP
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SEE - AMBP
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
AVY - AMBP
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
More