AMBP
Price
$3.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
58 days until earnings call
SCBGF
Price
$19.62
Change
-$0.32 (-1.60%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

AMBP vs SCBGF

Header iconAMBP vs SCBGF Comparison
Open Charts AMBP vs SCBGFBanner chart's image
Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
Price$3.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.12M
CapitalizationN/A
SIG GROUP AG
Price$19.62
Change-$0.32 (-1.60%)
Volume$145
CapitalizationN/A
AMBP vs SCBGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. SCBGF commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Hold and SCBGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (AMBP: $3.06 vs. SCBGF: $19.62)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and SCBGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 77% vs. SCBGF: 32%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.05B vs. SCBGF: $10.24B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.05B. SCBGF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $10.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCBGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBP is a better buy in the long-term than SCBGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCBGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBGF is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while SCBGF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.49% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBGF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than AMBP($2.05B). SCBGF has higher P/E ratio than AMBP: SCBGF (454.55) vs AMBP (40.65). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: -10.957 vs. SCBGF (-13.205). AMBP (508M) and SCBGF (502M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SCBGF has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. AMBP (434M). SCBGF has less debt than AMBP: SCBGF (2.68B) vs AMBP (3.73B). AMBP has higher revenues than SCBGF: AMBP (4.81B) vs SCBGF (2.78B).
AMBPSCBGFAMBP / SCBGF
Capitalization2.05B10.2B20%
EBITDA508M502M101%
Gain YTD-10.957-13.20583%
P/E Ratio40.65454.559%
Revenue4.81B2.78B173%
Total Cash434M490M89%
Total Debt3.73B2.68B140%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPSCBGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRGFX107.990.99
+0.93%
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock
FACNX65.590.40
+0.61%
Fidelity Advisor Canada A
ALVIX10.080.04
+0.40%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val Inv
EKSCX6.060.02
+0.33%
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr C
CWSIX21.290.03
+0.14%
Carillon Chartwell Small Cap Value I

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with CCK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then CCK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
N/A
CCK - AMBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
BALL - AMBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
PTVE - AMBP
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
SEE - AMBP
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
AVY - AMBP
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

SCBGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCBGF and OCTO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCBGF and OCTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBGF
1D Price
Change %
SCBGF100%
N/A
OCTO - SCBGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
NEXNF - SCBGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
ORRAF - SCBGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGIH - SCBGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
AMBP - SCBGF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More