AMBP
Price
$3.88
Change
-$0.76 (-16.38%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.05B
Earnings call today
SCBGF
Price
$18.88
Change
+$0.30 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
10.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMBP vs SCBGF

Header iconAMBP vs SCBGF Comparison
Open Charts AMBP vs SCBGFBanner chart's image
Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
Price$3.88
Change-$0.76 (-16.38%)
Volume$47.41K
Capitalization2.05B
SIG GROUP AG
Price$18.88
Change+$0.30 (+1.61%)
Volume$479
Capitalization10.24B
AMBP vs SCBGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMBP vs. SCBGF commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMBP is a Buy and SCBGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (AMBP: $4.64 vs. SCBGF: $18.88)
Brand notoriety: AMBP and SCBGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMBP: 55% vs. SCBGF: 30%
Market capitalization -- AMBP: $2.05B vs. SCBGF: $10.24B
AMBP [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $2.05B. SCBGF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $10.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCBGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCBGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMBP is a better buy in the long-term than SCBGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCBGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SCBGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCBGF is a better buy in the short-term than AMBP.

Price Growth

AMBP (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while SCBGF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+1.50% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCBGF($10.2B) has a higher market cap than AMBP($2.05B). SCBGF has higher P/E ratio than AMBP: SCBGF (454.55) vs AMBP (40.65). AMBP YTD gains are higher at: 64.431 vs. SCBGF (-4.205). AMBP (508M) and SCBGF (502M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SCBGF has more cash in the bank: 490M vs. AMBP (434M). SCBGF has less debt than AMBP: SCBGF (2.68B) vs AMBP (3.73B). AMBP has higher revenues than SCBGF: AMBP (4.81B) vs SCBGF (2.78B).
AMBPSCBGFAMBP / SCBGF
Capitalization2.05B10.2B20%
EBITDA508M502M101%
Gain YTD64.431-4.205-1,532%
P/E Ratio40.65454.559%
Revenue4.81B2.78B173%
Total Cash434M490M89%
Total Debt3.73B2.68B140%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMBPSCBGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCBGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NMAI12.610.06
+0.48%
Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund
PIPE23.640.08
+0.33%
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
VCRB76.98-0.21
-0.27%
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
RWM17.98-0.26
-1.43%
ProShares Short Russell2000
HIBS7.92-0.28
-3.41%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Br 3X ETF

AMBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMBP has been loosely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMBP jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMBP
1D Price
Change %
AMBP100%
+0.65%
BALL - AMBP
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CCK - AMBP
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
OI - AMBP
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
AVY - AMBP
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
SEE - AMBP
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
More

SCBGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SCBGF and OCTO have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCBGF and OCTO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCBGF
1D Price
Change %
SCBGF100%
N/A
OCTO - SCBGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+21.26%
NEXNF - SCBGF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
ORRAF - SCBGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGIH - SCBGF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
AMBP - SCBGF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More