Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCFX vs RGACX
AMCFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts AMCFX vs RGACX
AMCFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. AMCFX (97.1B). AMCFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AMCFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: AMCFX (18 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than AMCFX (0.44). AMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). AMCFX (250) and RGACX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. AMCFX (6.05). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. AMCFX (8.05).
| AMCFX | RGACX | AMCFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.93 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.93 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.157 | 6.185 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 7.94 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.14 | 43.05 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.05 | 13.23 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.06 | 107.97 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement