Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCFX vs RGAGX
AMCFX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts AMCFX vs RGAGX
AMCFX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCFX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCFX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. AMCFX (97.1B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than AMCFX: RGAGX (0.51) vs AMCFX (0.00). AMCFX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: AMCFX (18 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). AMCFX (0.44) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). AMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). AMCFX (250) and RGAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. AMCFX (6.05). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 20.99 vs. AMCFX (8.05).
| AMCFX | RGAGX | AMCFX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.29 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.29 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.157 | 8.887 | -36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.1B | 361B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 12.55 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.14 | 50.34 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.05 | 20.99 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.06 | 122.10 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement