Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCGX vs FSMAX
AMCGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCGX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth B
Price$9.49
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets238.62M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$86.76
Change-$0.36 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.02B
AMCGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCGX vs. FSMAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36B vs. AMCGX (239M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCGX: FSMAX (0.54) vs AMCGX (0.00). AMCGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCGX (32 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCGX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. AMCGX (7.60). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.71 vs. AMCGX (-16.01).
| AMCGX | FSMAX | AMCGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.04 | 5,686% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.04 | 5,686% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.455 | -4.137 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 239M | 36B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.60 | 8.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.49 | 38.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.01 | 63.71 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.59 | 64.93 | 6% |