Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCGX vs FSMAX
AMCGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCGX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth B
Price$11.30
Change+$0.06 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.41M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
AMCGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. AMCGX (279M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCGX: FSMAX (0.44) vs AMCGX (0.00). AMCGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCGX (32 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCGX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCGX (1000). AMCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.18 vs. FSMAX (16.92). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.96 vs. AMCGX (-20.58).
| AMCGX | FSMAX | AMCGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.04 | 5,686% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 0.04 | 5,686% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.464 | 11.147 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279M | 41B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.18 | 16.92 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.19 | 71.41 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.58 | 63.96 | -32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.64 | 118.30 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement