Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCGX vs FSMAX
AMCGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCGX vs FSMAX
AMCGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCGX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AMCGX (294M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AMCGX (0.00). AMCGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCGX (33 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AMCGX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.64 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCGX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCGX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. AMCGX (7.76). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.18 vs. AMCGX (-28.87).
| AMCGX | FSMAX | AMCGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.04 | 5,543% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.04 | 5,543% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.922 | 13.370 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 40.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 20.57 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.59 | 55.83 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.87 | 33.18 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.01 | 133.82 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers