Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$18.13
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets272.05M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.67
Change-$0.21 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. AMCZX (272M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.46) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCZX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.57 vs. FSMAX (18.22). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.90 vs. AMCZX (-0.53).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.596 | 4.170 | 326% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 39.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.57 | 18.22 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.08 | 39.44 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.53 | 50.90 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.11 | 82.73 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers