Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$19.06
Change-$0.08 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.83M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.73
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. AMCZX (284M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.44) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCZX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.83 vs. FSMAX (18.87). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.22 vs. AMCZX (2.60).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.925 | 10.926 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284M | 41B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.83 | 18.87 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.16 | 57.27 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.60 | 60.22 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.77 | 103.30 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement