Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$16.62
Change-$0.08 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets251.38M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$89.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. AMCZX (251M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCZX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.30 vs. FSMAX (11.51). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.40 vs. AMCZX (4.70).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.637 | -1.540 | -301% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.30 | 11.51 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.94 | 32.40 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.70 | 51.40 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.52 | 69.19 | 69% |