Ad is loading...
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$13.89
Change-$0.97 (-6.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.24M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$78.74
Change-$5.91 (-6.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. AMCZX (227M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.53) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCZX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.80 vs. AMCZX (0.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 106.28 vs. AMCZX (27.58).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.04 | 2,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.04 | 2,743% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.647 | -6.855 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 36.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 3.80 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.97 | 8.54 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.58 | 106.28 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.10 | - |