Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Z
Price$17.17
Change-$0.12 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.57M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.37
Change+$0.21 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. AMCZX (261M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.47) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (10 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMCZX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). AMCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.24 vs. FSMAX (18.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.51 vs. AMCZX (2.21).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.333 | 4.710 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261M | 39.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.24 | 18.33 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.47 | 53.76 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.21 | 62.51 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.91 | 79.28 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement