Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. AMCZX (298M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (11 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AMCZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.64 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.08 vs. AMCZX (19.60). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.47 vs. AMCZX (-8.32).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.04 | 2,629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.04 | 2,629% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.345 | 14.890 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 298M | 42.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.60 | 30.08 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.69 | 73.38 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.32 | 37.47 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.92 | 143.95 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers