Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMCZX vs FSMAX
AMCZX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMCZX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMCZX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. AMCZX (305M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMCZX: FSMAX (0.48) vs AMCZX (0.00). AMCZX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMCZX (11 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AMCZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMCZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.64 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMCZX: FSMAX (0) vs AMCZX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. AMCZX (18.66). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. AMCZX (-8.44).
| AMCZX | FSMAX | AMCZX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.04 | 2,257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.04 | 2,629% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.071 | 15.913 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 43.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.66 | 24.38 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.06 | 63.28 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.44 | 39.12 | -22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.91 | 139.20 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers