AMDL
Price
$66.94
Change
-$8.78 (-11.60%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.51B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSO
Price
$65.28
Change
-$1.92 (-2.86%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Net Assets
7.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMDL vs SSO

AMDL vs SSO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) vs. ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO)

Key Takeaways

  • GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) offers 2x daily leveraged exposure to a single semiconductor stock, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), making it a high-volatility thematic tool.
  • ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) delivers 2x daily leveraged exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index, providing amplified market-wide equity participation across multiple sectors.
  • Both ETFs employ daily reset leveraged structures, which can lead to compounding effects over longer holding periods and heightened sensitivity to market volatility.
  • Expense ratios differ notably, with AMDL at approximately 1.07% and SSO at 0.87%, reflecting their respective complexities in single-stock versus broad-index leverage.
  • AMDL concentrates risk in the technology sector, particularly semiconductors, while SSO offers diversified exposure across large- and mid-cap U.S. companies.
  • Investors seeking concentrated thematic bets may favor AMDL, whereas those targeting broad market amplification often consider SSO for its wider sector representation.

Introduction

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) represent two distinct leveraged strategies that appeal to investors pursuing amplified daily returns. AMDL focuses on a single high-growth technology name, while SSO targets the diversified S&P 500 Index. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not compete directly but offer alternative paths to leveraged equity exposure—one thematic and concentrated, the other broad and market-representative. In the current environment of sector rotation and interest-rate sensitivity, comparing their structural profiles helps clarify suitable positioning for different risk tolerances and investment objectives.

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) Overview

The GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD). It is a leveraged, single-stock ETF utilizing derivatives to achieve its objective. The fund typically maintains exposure through swaps or other instruments rather than holding a large number of individual securities. Its strategy is passive in execution but highly thematic, centered on the semiconductor industry. The expense ratio stands at 1.07%. Key distinguishing features include its concentrated risk profile and daily reset mechanism, which resets leverage each trading day. Liquidity remains adequate for active traders, though the single-name focus introduces elevated volatility relative to diversified products.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

The ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. It is a leveraged equity ETF employing futures, swaps, and other derivatives to magnify broad market movements. The fund holds exposure to approximately 500 large- and mid-cap U.S. companies, with top holdings typically including major technology, financial, and healthcare names. Its strategy is passive and rules-based, tracking a market-capitalization-weighted index. The expense ratio is 0.87%. Distinguishing characteristics include broad sector diversification and a long track record since its 2006 inception. The daily reset structure supports short-term tactical use while exposing longer-term holders to potential volatility decay.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader U.S. equity market, influenced by macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and technology sector momentum. The semiconductor industry, central to AMDL, benefits from artificial intelligence demand and supply-chain developments but faces risks from geopolitical tensions and cyclical downturns. The S&P 500, underlying SSO, reflects economy-wide trends including consumer spending, monetary policy shifts, and capital flows into large-cap growth stocks. Regulatory developments around technology and trade policies can affect both, while sector rotation between growth and value styles shapes relative performance dynamics. Capital continues to flow toward leveraged products during periods of market conviction, though these vehicles remain best suited for sophisticated, short-term strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, AMDL has exhibited significantly higher volatility due to its single-stock leverage on Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), amplifying movements tied to chip demand and company-specific news. SSO has delivered more moderated amplification aligned with overall S&P 500 trends, benefiting from diversification across multiple sectors during broad rallies. Relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking consistent market beta exposure, while AMDL suits those with strong convictions in semiconductor leadership. Both products experience compounding effects from daily resets, making them sensitive to trend consistency rather than isolated events. Sector momentum in technology has supported AMDL during favorable periods, whereas SSO captures broader participation across economic expansions and contractions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF comparison and discovery process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Its broader exposure across the S&P 500 reduces single-name concentration risk compared with AMDL while maintaining competitive expense characteristics and established liquidity. AMDL offers compelling thematic leverage for targeted semiconductor exposure but carries elevated volatility that may not align with diversified positioning objectives in varied market environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AMDL vs. SSO commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMDL is a Hold and SSO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 7.96B vs. AMDL (2.51B). AMDL has a higher annual dividend yield than SSO: AMDL (330.804) vs SSO (12.952). AMDL was incepted earlier than SSO: AMDL (2 years) vs SSO (20 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than AMDL (1.07). SSO has a higher turnover AMDL (0.00) vs AMDL (0.00).
AMDLSSOAMDL / SSO
Gain YTD330.80412.9522,554%
Net Assets2.51B7.96B31%
Total Expense Ratio1.070.87123%
Turnover0.004.00-
Yield0.000.61-
Fund Existence2 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMDLSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMDL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITOL26.57N/A
N/A
Tema International Durable Quality ETF
DSEP47.10-0.22
-0.46%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Sep
KOOL14.20-0.25
-1.72%
North Shore Equity Rotation ETF
HBTA31.90-0.76
-2.31%
Horizon Expedition Plus ETF
XNTK368.47-21.11
-5.42%
State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
-2.86%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
-4.13%