Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMFNX vs. LFMAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.53B vs. AMFNX (1.26B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than AMFNX: LFMAX (2.93) vs AMFNX (1.85). AMFNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AMFNX (8 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). LFMAX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.44). LFMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: LFMAX (2500) vs AMFNX (2500000). LFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. AMFNX (-16.77). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.53 vs. AMFNX (-10.95).
| AMFNX | LFMAX | AMFNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.13 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 2.13 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.789 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 1.53B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 2.93 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.77 | 0.93 | -1,801% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.30 | -12.11 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.95 | 3.53 | -310% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.01 | - |