Ad is loading...
AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMFNX vs. LFMAX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.59B vs. AMFNX (1.45B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than AMFNX: LFMAX (2.91) vs AMFNX (1.67). AMFNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AMFNX (8 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). LFMAX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.33). LFMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: LFMAX (2500) vs AMFNX (1000000). LFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.37 vs. AMFNX (-26.96). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.07 vs. AMFNX (-11.31).
| AMFNX | LFMAX | AMFNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.14 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.14 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.133 | -1.309 | 1,233% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 1.59B | 92% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 2.91 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.96 | -5.37 | 502% |
| Returns for 3 years | -37.78 | -10.81 | 350% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.31 | 4.07 | -278% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...