Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMFNX vs. LFMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. AMFNX (1.27B). LFMAX pays higher dividends than AMFNX: LFMAX (2.94) vs AMFNX (1.89). AMFNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AMFNX (8 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). LFMAX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.44). LFMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: LFMAX (2500) vs AMFNX (2500000). LFMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.31 vs. AMFNX (-15.81). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.20 vs. AMFNX (-13.04).
| AMFNX | LFMAX | AMFNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.13 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 2.13 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.277 | -0.916 | 1,886% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 1.54B | 82% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 2.94 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.81 | 1.31 | -1,209% |
| Returns for 3 years | -38.30 | -9.57 | 400% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.04 | 1.20 | -1,085% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement