Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMFNX vs. LFMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. AMFNX (949M). LFMAX pays higher dividends than AMFNX: LFMAX (2.71) vs AMFNX (2.34). AMFNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AMFNX (9 years) vs LFMAX (15 years). LFMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.43). AMFNX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFMAX: AMFNX (0) vs LFMAX (2500). AMFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.11 vs. LFMAX (12.44). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. AMFNX (1.13).
| AMFNX | LFMAX | AMFNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.00 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.961 | 10.644 | 178% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 949M | 1.75B | 54% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 2.71 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.11 | 12.44 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.82 | 13.91 | -13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.13 | 13.46 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement