Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMFNX vs LFMAX
AMFNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMFNX vs. LFMAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMFNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFMAX has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. AMFNX (925M). LFMAX pays higher dividends than AMFNX: LFMAX (2.68) vs AMFNX (2.37). AMFNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AMFNX (9 years) vs LFMAX (15 years). LFMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than AMFNX (1.43). LFMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMFNX: LFMAX (2500) vs AMFNX (2500000). AMFNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.38 vs. LFMAX (13.07). LFMAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.86 vs. AMFNX (-8.20).
| AMFNX | LFMAX | AMFNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 2.00 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.429 | 8.804 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 925M | 1.7B | 55% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 2.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.38 | 13.07 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.13 | 14.14 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.20 | 7.86 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement