AMG
Price
$370.22
Change
+$4.04 (+1.10%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
9.57B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FHI
Price
$62.40
Change
+$0.24 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.66B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMG vs FHI

AMG vs FHI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMG vs. FHI commentary
Sep 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMG is a StrongBuy and FHI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2026
Stock price -- (AMG: $370.22 vs. FHI: $62.40)
Brand notoriety: AMG and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMG: 92% vs. FHI: 70%
Market capitalization -- AMG: $9.57B vs. FHI: $4.66B
AMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $9.57B. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than AMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than AMG.

Price Growth

AMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.69% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMG($9.57B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4.66B). AMG has higher P/E ratio than FHI: AMG (12.99) vs FHI (11.60). AMG YTD gains are higher at: 28.424 vs. FHI (22.206). AMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.67B vs. FHI (592M). FHI has less debt than AMG: FHI (452M) vs AMG (2.92B). AMG has higher revenues than FHI: AMG (2.27B) vs FHI (1.93B).
AMGFHIAMG / FHI
Capitalization9.57B4.66B205%
EBITDA1.67B592M282%
Gain YTD28.42422.206128%
P/E Ratio12.9911.60112%
Revenue2.27B1.93B117%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.92B452M646%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMG vs FHI: Fundamental Ratings
AMG
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
139
SMR RATING
1..100
4130
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7446
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FHI's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMG (90) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew significantly faster than AMG’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as AMG (13) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to AMG’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as AMG (41) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to AMG’s over the last 12 months.

AMG's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (49) in the null industry. This means that AMG’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as AMG (74) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to AMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMGFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOLS63.732.36
+3.85%
Solstice Advanced Materials Inc
HAPN17.750.17
+0.97%
Happen Inc
ASPCU11.97N/A
N/A
A SPAC III Acquisition Corp
MEVO10.03N/A
N/A
M Evo Global Acquisition Corp II
LFS2.18-0.05
-2.24%
Leifras Co Ltd