FHI
Price
$57.92
Change
+$0.61 (+1.06%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.4B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IVZ
Price
$29.93
Change
+$0.13 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.27B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHI vs IVZ

FHI vs IVZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHI vs. IVZ commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHI is a Buy and IVZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (FHI: $57.92 vs. IVZ: $29.93)
Brand notoriety: FHI and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHI: 68% vs. IVZ: 66%
Market capitalization -- FHI: $4.4B vs. IVZ: $13.27B
FHI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.4B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $13.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FHI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than FHI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the short-term than FHI.

Price Growth

FHI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.31% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHI is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVZ($13.3B) has a higher market cap than FHI($4.4B). IVZ has higher P/E ratio than FHI: IVZ (19.48) vs FHI (11.25). IVZ YTD gains are higher at: 15.749 vs. FHI (12.751). IVZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.5B vs. FHI (576M). IVZ has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. FHI (645M). FHI has less debt than IVZ: FHI (451M) vs IVZ (9.44B). IVZ has higher revenues than FHI: IVZ (6.59B) vs FHI (1.86B).
FHIIVZFHI / IVZ
Capitalization4.4B13.3B33%
EBITDA576M1.5B38%
Gain YTD12.75115.74981%
P/E Ratio11.2519.4858%
Revenue1.86B6.59B28%
Total Cash645M1.71B38%
Total Debt451M9.44B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7839
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1562
SMR RATING
1..100
3195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4710
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (12) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FHI (81) in the null industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew significantly faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (62) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVZ (95) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (47) in the null industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (69) in the null industry. This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHIIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IVZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SETH47.050.38
+0.81%
ProShares Short Ether ETF
SBI7.710.02
+0.29%
Western Asset Intermediate Muni Fund
LOTI26.18N/A
N/A
Liberty One Tactical Income ETF
HYGH86.21-0.21
-0.24%
iShares Interest Rate Hdg Hi Yld Bd ETF
FBTC55.83-0.56
-0.99%
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund