AMG
Price
$362.10
Change
+$3.03 (+0.84%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.48B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OWL
Price
$12.21
Change
-$0.10 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
19.21B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMG vs OWL

AMG vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMG vs. OWL commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMG is a StrongBuy and OWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2026
Stock price -- (AMG: $359.07 vs. OWL: $12.32)
Brand notoriety: AMG and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMG: 100% vs. OWL: 133%
Market capitalization -- AMG: $9.48B vs. OWL: $19.21B
AMG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $9.48B. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $19.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $177.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMG is a better buy in the long-term than OWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the short-term than AMG.

Price Growth

AMG (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.35% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMG is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OWL($19.2B) has a higher market cap than AMG($9.48B). OWL has higher P/E ratio than AMG: OWL (102.67) vs AMG (12.60). AMG YTD gains are higher at: 24.556 vs. OWL (-13.923). AMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.67B vs. OWL (941M). AMG has less debt than OWL: AMG (2.92B) vs OWL (4.35B). OWL has higher revenues than AMG: OWL (2.99B) vs AMG (2.27B).
AMGOWLAMG / OWL
Capitalization9.48B19.2B49%
EBITDA1.67B941M178%
Gain YTD24.556-13.923-176%
P/E Ratio12.60102.6712%
Revenue2.27B2.99B76%
Total CashN/A169M-
Total Debt2.92B4.35B67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMG: Fundamental Ratings
AMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMGOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXOZ5.880.69
+13.20%
eXoZymes Inc
SEDG33.311.10
+3.42%
SolarEdge Technologies
ZION71.000.38
+0.54%
Zions Bancorporation NA
PACHU10.43N/A
N/A
Pioneer Acquisition I Corp
ACCO4.29-0.06
-1.38%
Acco Brands Corp

OWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OWL has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OWL jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OWL
1D Price
Change %
OWL100%
+5.75%
ARES - OWL
78%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
BX - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
+3.89%
TPG - OWL
73%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
KKR - OWL
70%
Closely correlated
+6.88%
APO - OWL
69%
Closely correlated
+6.26%
More