Ad is loading...
AMGAX vs FSMAX
AMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMGAX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth A
Price$14.13
Change+$0.40 (+2.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets216.76M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$81.49
Change+$2.00 (+2.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
AMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGAX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. AMGAX (217M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMGAX: FSMAX (0.53) vs AMGAX (0.00). AMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMGAX (28 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMGAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs AMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.98 vs. AMGAX (0.66). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 66.04 vs. AMGAX (1.89).
| AMGAX | FSMAX | AMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.04 | 3,629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.04 | 3,629% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.670 | -12.533 | 85% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 36.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | 0.98 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.26 | 10.93 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.89 | 66.04 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.81 | 49.78 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...