Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMGAX vs FSMAX
AMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMGAX vs FSMAX
AMGAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMGAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGAX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. AMGAX (294M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMGAX: FSMAX (0.48) vs AMGAX (0.00). AMGAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMGAX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AMGAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.64 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMGAX: FSMAX (0) vs AMGAX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.73 vs. AMGAX (12.10). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.29 vs. AMGAX (-16.89).
| AMGAX | FSMAX | AMGAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.04 | 3,486% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.04 | 3,486% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.677 | 14.324 | 33% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 43.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.10 | 19.73 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.04 | 59.29 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.89 | 34.29 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.31 | 134.59 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers