Ad is loading...
AMGCX vs FSMAX
AMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMGCX vs FSMAX
Alger Mid Cap Growth C
Price$7.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.02M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.78
Change+$0.62 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
AMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. AMGCX (212M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMGCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs AMGCX (0.00). AMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMGCX (28 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). AMGCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.90 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs AMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.16 vs. AMGCX (-1.53). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.14 vs. AMGCX (-22.55).
| AMGCX | FSMAX | AMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.04 | 5,743% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.04 | 5,743% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.994 | -14.415 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 36.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.53 | 1.16 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.80 | 6.38 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.55 | 62.14 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.02 | 45.88 | -35% |