Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMGCX vs FSMAX
AMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMGCX vs FSMAX
AMGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. AMGCX (305M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMGCX: FSMAX (0.48) vs AMGCX (0.00). AMGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMGCX (29 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AMGCX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.64 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMGCX: FSMAX (0) vs AMGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.38 vs. AMGCX (17.47). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. AMGCX (-28.04).
| AMGCX | FSMAX | AMGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.04 | 5,829% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.04 | 5,829% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.505 | 15.913 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 43.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.47 | 24.38 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.07 | 63.28 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.04 | 39.12 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.13 | 139.20 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers