Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMGOX vs FSMAX
AMGOX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMGOX vs FSMAX
AMGOX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMGOX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMGOX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. AMGOX (166M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than AMGOX: FSMAX (0.50) vs AMGOX (0.00). AMGOX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: AMGOX (33 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). AMGOX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). AMGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.86 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMGOX: FSMAX (0) vs AMGOX (500000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.93 vs. AMGOX (13.85). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. AMGOX (-26.37).
| AMGOX | FSMAX | AMGOX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.04 | 2,629% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.04 | 2,686% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.461 | 20.344 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 25.93 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.25 | 74.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.37 | 40.97 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.67 | 144.05 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement