This comparison examines AMH and MAA, two prominent residential REITs navigating a dynamic housing market. Investors seeking stable income through dividends or exposure to rental demand in single-family and multifamily segments will find value here. With interest rate sensitivities and regional supply dynamics influencing performance, understanding their relative positioning aids portfolio allocation amid recent market volatility in real estate.
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is an internally managed REIT specializing in single-family home rentals, owning approximately 61,000 properties across 24 states as of late 2025. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range (27.22–39.49), closing around $30.55. Year-to-date gains stand at 3.72%, with one-year returns at 14.09%. Key influences include Q4 2025 results showing 4.2% year-over-year revenue growth to $455 million, driven by rental increases, though shares faced pressure from broader REIT sector headwinds and analyst target adjustments, such as Deutsche Bank's recent hold rating at $30. Stable occupancy above 92% has supported sentiment, positioning AMH for potential recovery in single-family demand.
Mid-America Apartment Communities (MAA) owns and manages over 104,000 apartment units in the Southeast, Southwest, and Mid-Atlantic regions. The stock, recently at $125.72, hovers near its 52-week low (120.30–169.00). It has delivered stronger year-to-date performance of 7.35% and one-year returns of 17.49%. Recent quarters featured Q4 2025 earnings beats on core funds from operations (FFO—a key REIT profitability metric) and revenue of $555.6 million, alongside a 10 basis point occupancy rise. However, Sun Belt supply pressures and analyst price target cuts (e.g., Wells Fargo's overweight at $140) have tempered gains, with upcoming Q1 2026 results on April 29 anticipated to reflect renewal strength offsetting new-lease challenges.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, which trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using diverse strategies like trend following, mean reversion, and multi-agent systems. These bots display impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from +15% to +167%, win rates of 48%–88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and trade durations from 1 day to 55 days. Examples include semiconductor-focused bots with +90%+ returns and 60%+ win rates. Tailored for current conditions, they offer short-term (5–60 minutes) to longer horizons, appealing to traders seeking automated, data-driven edges. Explore the page to identify bots matching your style.
AMH and MAA share residential REIT exposure but diverge in models: AMH's single-family focus benefits from homeownership barriers and lower turnover, while MAA's multifamily scale leverages economies in high-demand Sun Belt areas. Growth drivers include AMH's development pipeline and MAA's acquisitions. Recent momentum favors MAA on YTD returns, but AMH shows a higher price growth rating (74 vs. 60). Risks involve interest rate sensitivity for both, with MAA more exposed to apartment supply gluts. Market sentiment reflects valuation trade-offs, AMH appearing cheaper on P/E.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors AMH due to its superior price growth rating, lower valuation multiples, and resilient single-family rental trends amid housing shortages. While MAA offers stronger recent returns and yield, AMH's relative stability and upside potential to analyst targets position it probabilistically better in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while MAA (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.11%.
AMH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MAA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| AMH | MAA | AMH / MAA | |
| Capitalization | 12B | 16.2B | 74% |
| EBITDA | 1.23B | 1.23B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 4.917 | 2.390 | 206% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.07 | 42.10 | 64% |
| Revenue | 1.86B | 2.21B | 84% |
| Total Cash | 63.3M | 71.5M | 89% |
| Total Debt | 5.15B | 5.66B | 91% |
AMH | MAA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MAA's Valuation (28) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (46). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (98). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's SMR Rating (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (83). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (48). This means that MAA’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
MAA's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMH (72). This means that MAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMH’s over the last 12 months.
| AMH | MAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 14 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAA has been closely correlated with CPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAA jumps, then CPT could also see price increases.