Advertisement
AMH vs INVH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) vs. Invitation Homes (INVH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both AMH and INVH are leading single-family rental real estate investment trusts (REITs), with INVH boasting a larger market cap of $16.4 billion compared to AMH's $11.1 billion.
- Dividend yields are comparable at around 4%, with AMH recently announcing a 10% quarterly distribution increase.
- Recent quarterly results showed rent growth for both, though INVH reported higher revenues of $2.72 billion trailing twelve months (TTM).
- AMH exhibits lower debt-to-equity (66%) versus INVH (88%), suggesting relatively lower leverage risk.
- Year-to-date returns are mixed but positive for AMH (~3.7%) amid broader real estate sector pressures, with both stocks gaining over recent weeks.
- Upcoming Q1 2026 earnings (May 6 for AMH, April 29 for INVH) could influence near-term momentum.
Introduction
AMH (American Homes 4 Rent) and INVH (Invitation Homes) dominate the single-family rental REIT sector, owning tens of thousands of homes across the U.S. This stock comparison is ideal for income-focused investors and traders eyeing residential real estate exposure amid shifting housing dynamics. Both companies benefit from strong rental demand but face headwinds from elevated interest rates and new supply. By examining recent performance, financial health, and market positioning, investors can gauge relative strengths in this niche, where stable cash flows meet growth potential through portfolio expansion.
AMH Overview and Recent Performance
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) owns and manages single-family rental properties, primarily in high-growth Sun Belt markets. In recent quarters, the company reported core funds from operations (FFO, a key REIT profitability metric) in line with estimates, with rents and other revenues up 4.2% year-over-year to $455 million in Q4 2025. A 10% quarterly dividend hike underscored confidence in cash flow stability. Stock price has hovered around $30.55, with YTD gains near 3.7% and one-month returns above 9%, reflecting resilience despite sector volatility. Sentiment benefits from lower leverage and a $500 million share repurchase authorization, though broader real estate pressures like rising expenses temper gains. Q1 2026 results are due May 6.
INVH Overview and Recent Performance
Invitation Homes (INVH), the largest single-family rental REIT, operates over 80,000 homes nationwide. Q4 2025 delivered FFO meeting expectations and revenues beating forecasts, with same-store core revenues up 1.7% despite 4% expense growth. An acquisition of ResiBuilt for $89 million in January enhanced property maintenance capabilities. Trading near $27.30, shares show YTD returns around 0.5% but recent one-month gains exceeding 9%, buoyed by scale advantages. Analyst adjustments, like Mizuho's lowered price target, reflect caution on rent growth amid supply pressures, with Q1 earnings set for April 29.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available, each scanning thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—trend-following, scalping, or multi-agent systems—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 167%, win rates reaching 87.7%, and profit factors as high as 11.7, often in volatile sectors like semiconductors or leveraged ETFs. Risk management via take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%) appeals to varied risk tolerances. While neither AMH nor INVH features prominently, the platform’s real-time signals suit active traders navigating REIT volatility. Explore these bots for data-driven strategies tailored to current markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both AMH and INVH pursue similar business models: acquiring, renovating, and renting single-family homes, generating revenue from stable occupancy rates above 95%. INVH leads in scale with higher TTM revenue ($2.72B vs. $1.85B) and EBITDA, driving growth via tuck-in acquisitions, while AMH emphasizes organic expansion in select markets. Recent momentum favors both with similar one-month gains, but AMH edges YTD performance. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity—AMH’s lower debt-to-equity reduces refinancing risks—and apartment supply competition curbing rents. Sector exposure is identical (residential REITs), but market sentiment tilts neutral, with hold ratings prevalent. Trade-offs: INVH offers diversification via size; AMH provides conservative leverage.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward AMH with moderate conviction, citing its recent dividend boost, lower leverage, and relative stability in recent market activity. INVH remains competitive via scale and catalysts like acquisitions, but higher debt introduces variability. Probabilistic edge to AMH for trend consistency amid REIT pressures; monitor Q1 earnings for shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMH is a Buy and INVH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileINVH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- INVH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INVH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INVH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while INVH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
INVH is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.14% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| AMH | INVH | AMH / INVH | |
| Capitalization | 11.5B | 17.1B | 67% |
| EBITDA | 1.23B | 1.71B | 72% |
| Gain YTD | 0.946 | 4.644 | 20% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.04 | 30.24 | 86% |
| Revenue | 1.86B | 2.79B | 67% |
| Total Cash | 63.3M | 114M | 56% |
| Total Debt | 5.15B | 8.8B | 58% |
AMH | INVH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMH's Valuation (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (89). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (94). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's SMR Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (81). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
INVH's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (52). This means that INVH’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as INVH (83). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
| AMH | INVH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 48% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 20 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QGRD | 29.48 | 0.56 | +1.93% |
| Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | |||
| INFO | 26.61 | 0.21 | +0.81% |
| Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Lg Cp Cor ETF | |||
| NRES | 34.29 | 0.26 | +0.76% |
| Xtrackers RREEF Global Natrl Res ETF | |||
| FMAG | 36.02 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Fidelity Magellan ETF | |||
| RAVI | 75.28 | 0.03 | +0.04% |
| FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | |||
AMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
INVH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INVH has been closely correlated with AMH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INVH jumps, then AMH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INVH | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| AMH - INVH | 86% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| UDR - INVH | 74% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MAA - INVH | 74% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CPT - INVH | 73% Closely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| EQR - INVH | 71% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||