Analysis and predictions AMN vs INNV
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMN is a Hold and INNV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINNV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- INNV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INNV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- INNV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
AMN (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +7.04% price change this week, while INNV (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +7.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMN is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
INNV is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.53% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| AMN | INNV | AMN / INNV | |
| Capitalization | 2.35B | 639M | 368% |
| EBITDA | 499M | -15.45M | -3,229% |
| Gain YTD | -19.591 | -32.000 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.59 | 36.76 | 32% |
| Revenue | 3.79B | 721M | 526% |
| Total Cash | 32.9M | 98.8M | 33% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 112M | 1,205% |
AMN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMN | INNV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 83% |
AMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMN has been closely correlated with CCRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMN jumps, then CCRN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMN | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| CCRN - AMN | 73% Closely correlated | -6.48% | ||
| INNV - AMN | 30% Poorly correlated | +5.15% | ||
| MD - AMN | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| AGL - AMN | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
| NHC - AMN | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.51% | ||
More | ||||
INNV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that INNV and AVAH have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INNV and AVAH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INNV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INNV | 100% | +5.15% | ||
| AVAH - INNV | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
| AMN - INNV | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| UHS - INNV | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| USPH - INNV | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
| ASTH - INNV | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||