Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMOM vs IVW
AMOM vs IVW Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IVW
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$47.46
Change-$0.36 (-0.75%)
Volume$171
Net Assets29.96M
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
Price$119.15
Change-$0.59 (-0.49%)
Volume$32.18K
Net Assets66B
AMOM vs IVW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IVW commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Hold and IVW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 66B vs. AMOM (30M). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than AMOM: IVW (17.766) vs AMOM (5.106). AMOM was incepted earlier than IVW: AMOM (6 years) vs IVW (25 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than AMOM (0.75). AMOM has a higher turnover IVW (31.00) vs IVW (31.00).
| AMOM | IVW | AMOM / IVW | |
| Gain YTD | 5.106 | 17.766 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 30M | 66B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.18 | 417% |
| Turnover | 354.00 | 31.00 | 1,142% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.44 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IVW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMOM and ADSK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMOM and ADSK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -0.75% | ||
| ADSK - AMOM | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| HUBB - AMOM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| MDB - AMOM | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.66% | ||
| CCO - AMOM | 25% Poorly correlated | +7.75% | ||
| HUBS - AMOM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||
IVW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IVW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| NVDA - IVW | 81% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| AMZN - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| ETN - IVW | 78% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| PH - IVW | 77% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| META - IVW | 77% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||