Ad is loading...
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$44.20
Change-$2.25 (-4.84%)
Volume$18.33K
Net Assets45.43M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$404.88
Change-$9.40 (-2.27%)
Volume$1.27M
Net Assets105.31B
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 105B vs. AMOM (45.4M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than AMOM: IWF (0.822) vs AMOM (-2.169). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (6 years) vs IWF (25 years). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (14.00) vs IWF (14.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -2.169 | 0.822 | -264% |
| Net Assets | 45.4M | 105B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 506.00 | 14.00 | 3,614% |
| Yield | 0.29 | 0.58 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMOM has been loosely correlated with TT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMOM jumps, then TT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -4.84% | ||
| TT - AMOM | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| COIN - AMOM | 49% Loosely correlated | -8.27% | ||
| DDOG - AMOM | 47% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| ADSK - AMOM | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
| HUBB - AMOM | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||