Ad is loading...
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$43.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Volume$10.18K
CapitalizationN/A
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$384.52
Change+$0.34 (+0.09%)
Volume$887.62K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Oct 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a StrongBuy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 100B vs. AMOM (41.6M). AMOM has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: AMOM (31.258) vs IWF (27.337). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (5 years) vs IWF (24 years). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (14.00) vs IWF (14.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 31.258 | 27.337 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 100B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 506.00 | 14.00 | 3,614% |
| Yield | 0.29 | 0.58 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMOM has been loosely correlated with TT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMOM jumps, then TT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | -0.44% | ||
| TT - AMOM | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| DDOG - AMOM | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| COIN - AMOM | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| ADSK - AMOM | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| HUBB - AMOM | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AVGO - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||