Advertisement
AMPH vs AMRX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMPH is a StrongBuy and AMRX is a StrongBuy.
AMPH | AMRX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMPH's Valuation (62) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as AMRX (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMPH’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMPH (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that AMRX’s stock grew significantly faster than AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
AMPH's SMR Rating (69) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as AMRX (99) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMPH’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AMPH (39) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that AMRX’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
AMPH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMRX (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMPH’s stock grew significantly faster than AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
| AMPH | AMRX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while AMRX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AMRX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AMRX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- AMRX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMPH (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while AMRX (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +1.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -4.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMPH is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
AMRX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-4.75% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MLPI | 50.66 | 0.45 | +0.90% |
| NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) | |||
| JAAA | 50.46 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) | |||
| MBSF | 25.36 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) | |||
| LBAY | 24.65 | -0.20 | -0.80% |
| Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) | |||
| TECS | 50.17 | -1.70 | -3.28% |
| Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETF (TECS) | |||
AMPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMPH has been loosely correlated with AMRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMPH jumps, then AMRX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMPH | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| AMRX - AMPH | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| IXHL - AMPH | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| EBS - AMPH | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
| VTRS - AMPH | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| ZTS - AMPH | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||
AMRX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMRX has been loosely correlated with AMPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMRX jumps, then AMPH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMRX | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| AMPH - AMRX | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| VTRS - AMRX | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| TEVA - AMRX | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ANIP - AMRX | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| COLL - AMRX | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||