It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMPH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMPH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMPH is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
PAHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2025.
AMPH | PAHC | AMPH / PAHC | |
Capitalization | 1.11B | 1.14B | 97% |
EBITDA | 259M | 123M | 211% |
Gain YTD | -35.874 | 31.443 | -114% |
P/E Ratio | 8.92 | 36.03 | 25% |
Revenue | 731M | 1.19B | 61% |
Total Cash | 237M | 70.4M | 337% |
Total Debt | 653M | 770M | 85% |
AMPH | PAHC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAHC's Valuation (25) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMPH (66) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AMPH (91) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
AMPH's SMR Rating (46) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as PAHC (63) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that AMPH’s stock grew similarly to PAHC’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AMPH (63) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AMPH (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to AMPH’s over the last 12 months.
AMPH | PAHC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago70% | 5 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMPH has been loosely correlated with AMRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMPH jumps, then AMRX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMPH | 100% | +10.13% | ||
AMRX - AMPH | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.02% | ||
COLL - AMPH | 39% Loosely correlated | +6.04% | ||
ZTS - AMPH | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
VTRS - AMPH | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.30% | ||
HROW - AMPH | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.67% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAHC has been loosely correlated with AMRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAHC jumps, then AMRX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAHC | 100% | N/A | ||
AMRX - PAHC | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.02% | ||
PBH - PAHC | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
ZTS - PAHC | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
ELAN - PAHC | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
VTRS - PAHC | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.30% | ||
More |