Advertisement
AMRX vs PAHC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRX is a StrongBuy and PAHC is a Hold.
| AMRX | PAHC | AMRX / PAHC | |
| Capitalization | 5.93B | 1.45B | 410% |
| EBITDA | 623M | 233M | 267% |
| Gain YTD | 35.000 | -3.733 | -938% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.44 | 14.65 | 242% |
| Revenue | 3.12B | 1.52B | 205% |
| Total Cash | 128M | 82M | 156% |
| Total Debt | 2.79B | 789M | 354% |
AMRX | PAHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 10 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAHC's Valuation (10) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMRX (84). This means that PAHC’s stock grew significantly faster than AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAHC (71). This means that AMRX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAHC’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's SMR Rating (34) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMRX (99). This means that PAHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
AMRX's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as PAHC (51). This means that AMRX’s stock grew similarly to PAHC’s over the last 12 months.
PAHC's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as AMRX (100). This means that PAHC’s stock grew similarly to AMRX’s over the last 12 months.
| AMRX | PAHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMRX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PAHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMRX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAHC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMRX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAHC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMRX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PAHC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMRX (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -2.47% price change this week, while PAHC (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -6.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -5.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMRX is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PAHC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-5.31% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMQQ | 32.28 | 0.11 | +0.34% |
| EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | |||
| TAXT | 49.92 | 0.12 | +0.23% |
| Northern Trust Tax Exempt Bond ETF | |||
| BSV | 76.74 | -0.08 | -0.10% |
| Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
| AWF | 9.96 | -0.05 | -0.50% |
| ALLIANCEBERSTEIN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND | |||
| GGLS | 59.52 | -1.07 | -1.76% |
| Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF | |||
AMRX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMRX has been loosely correlated with AMPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMRX jumps, then AMPH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMRX | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| AMPH - AMRX | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TEVA - AMRX | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| VTRS - AMRX | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| ANIP - AMRX | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| COLL - AMRX | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
More | ||||
PAHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAHC has been loosely correlated with ZTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAHC jumps, then ZTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAHC | 100% | -2.62% | ||
| ZTS - PAHC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| ELAN - PAHC | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| VTRS - PAHC | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| LFCR - PAHC | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| AMRX - PAHC | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||