AMR
Price
$110.58
Change
+$2.94 (+2.73%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
55 days until earnings call
BTU
Price
$13.24
Change
+$0.06 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMR vs BTU

Header iconAMR vs BTU Comparison
Open Charts AMR vs BTUBanner chart's image
Alpha Metallurgical Resources
Price$110.58
Change+$2.94 (+2.73%)
Volume$218.47K
Capitalization4.23B
Peabody Energy
Price$13.24
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
Volume$2.88M
Capitalization3.1B
AMR vs BTU Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMR vs. BTU commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMR is a Hold and BTU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AMR: $110.58 vs. BTU: $13.24)
Brand notoriety: AMR and BTU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMR: 72% vs. BTU: 53%
Market capitalization -- AMR: $4.23B vs. BTU: $3.1B
AMR [@Coal] is valued at $4.23B. BTU’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBTU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BTU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTU is a better buy in the long-term than AMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTU’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BTU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTU is a better buy in the short-term than AMR.

Price Growth

AMR (@Coal) experienced а -1.30% price change this week, while BTU (@Coal) price change was +0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

BTU is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (+1.82% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMR($4.23B) has a higher market cap than BTU($3.1B). AMR has higher P/E ratio than BTU: AMR (6.60) vs BTU (4.83). BTU YTD gains are higher at: -36.145 vs. AMR (-44.743). BTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.51B vs. AMR (998M). BTU has more cash in the bank: 969M vs. AMR (268M). AMR has less debt than BTU: AMR (10.4M) vs BTU (399M). BTU has higher revenues than AMR: BTU (4.95B) vs AMR (3.47B).
AMRBTUAMR / BTU
Capitalization4.23B3.1B136%
EBITDA998M1.51B66%
Gain YTD-44.743-36.145124%
P/E Ratio6.604.83137%
Revenue3.47B4.95B70%
Total Cash268M969M28%
Total Debt10.4M399M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMR vs BTU: Fundamental Ratings
AMR
BTU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7163
SMR RATING
1..100
8766
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTU's Valuation (39) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMR (82) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMR’s over the last 12 months.

BTU's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (71) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.

BTU's SMR Rating (66) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (87) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.

BTU's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (92) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.

AMR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTU (81) in the Coal industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew significantly faster than BTU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMRBTU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPWYX14.750.13
+0.89%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Y
RERGX60.940.19
+0.31%
American Funds EUPAC R6
DPRSX12.780.01
+0.08%
Macquarie Global Listed Real Assets Inst
MLPRX4.72N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income C
HMVFX15.24N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap Value F