It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBTU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMR (@Coal) experienced а -0.63% price change this week, while BTU (@Coal) price change was -6.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.02%.
AMR is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2025.
BTU is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
AMR | BTU | AMR / BTU | |
Capitalization | 4.23B | 3.1B | 136% |
EBITDA | 998M | 1.51B | 66% |
Gain YTD | -30.612 | 11.350 | -270% |
P/E Ratio | 6.60 | 4.83 | 137% |
Revenue | 3.47B | 4.95B | 70% |
Total Cash | 268M | 969M | 28% |
Total Debt | 10.4M | 399M | 3% |
AMR | BTU | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 2 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTU's Valuation (46) in the Coal industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMR (81) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMR’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as BTU (42) in the Coal industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to BTU’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's SMR Rating (41) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as BTU (47) in the Coal industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to BTU’s over the last 12 months.
BTU's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (57) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.
BTU's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Coal industry is in the same range as AMR (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that BTU’s stock grew similarly to AMR’s over the last 12 months.
AMR | BTU | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago86% | 12 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago88% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMR has been closely correlated with HCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMR jumps, then HCC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMR | 100% | -0.26% | ||
HCC - AMR | 79% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
ARCH - AMR | 75% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
METC - AMR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.10% | ||
BTU - AMR | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.15% | ||
CEIX - AMR | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTU has been closely correlated with ARCH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTU jumps, then ARCH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BTU | 100% | -1.15% | ||
ARCH - BTU | 73% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
CEIX - BTU | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
HCC - BTU | 69% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
METC - BTU | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
AMR - BTU | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More |