Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMRAX vs RGAGX
AMRAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts AMRAX vs RGAGX
AMRAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMRAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. AMRAX (19.9M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than AMRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs AMRAX (0.00). AMRAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: AMRAX (31 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). AMRAX (5.13) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMRAX (8.00). AMRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: AMRAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. AMRAX (-5.85). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. AMRAX (-21.70).
| AMRAX | RGAGX | AMRAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 5.13 | 0.29 | 1,769% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.13 | 0.29 | 1,769% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 9.321 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.85 | 0.49 | -1,195% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.18 | 44.65 | -5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.70 | 15.00 | -145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.04 | 110.30 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers