Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMRAX vs RGAGX
AMRAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts AMRAX vs RGAGX
AMRAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMRAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRAX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. AMRAX (19.9M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than AMRAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs AMRAX (0.00). AMRAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: AMRAX (30 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). AMRAX (5.13) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. AMRAX (8.00). AMRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: AMRAX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. AMRAX (-2.33). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. AMRAX (-21.99).
| AMRAX | RGAGX | AMRAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 5.13 | 0.29 | 1,769% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.13 | 0.29 | 1,769% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 7.335 | - |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.9M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | 4.75 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.33 | 41.00 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.99 | 17.74 | -124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.71 | 106.44 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement