Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTOX vs CWGCX
AMTOX vs CWGCX Comparison
Open Charts AMTOX vs CWGCX
AMTOX vs CWGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTOX vs. CWGCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTOX is a Hold and CWGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. AMTOX (763M). AMTOX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: AMTOX (5.91) vs CWGCX (0.75). AMTOX was incepted earlier than CWGCX: AMTOX (16 years) vs CWGCX (25 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than AMTOX (1.18). AMTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGCX (44.00). CWGCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTOX: CWGCX (250) vs AMTOX (5000). AMTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.22 vs. CWGCX (17.91). AMTOX return over 5 years is better than : 51.97 vs. CWGCX (28.03).
| AMTOX | CWGCX | AMTOX / CWGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.48 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 1.48 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.374 | 13.037 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 763M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.91 | 0.75 | 791% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.22 | 17.91 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 46.90 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.97 | 28.03 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.75 | 98.70 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers