Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTOX vs. CWGFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTOX is a Buy and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. AMTOX (806M). AMTOX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: AMTOX (5.76) vs CWGFX (1.29). AMTOX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: AMTOX (17 years) vs CWGFX (26 years). AMTOX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). AMTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTOX: CWGFX (250) vs AMTOX (5000). AMTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.59 vs. CWGFX (11.47). AMTOX return over 5 years is better than : 57.96 vs. CWGFX (32.66).
| AMTOX | CWGFX | AMTOX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.79 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.79 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.669 | 15.977 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 806M | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.76 | 1.29 | 447% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.59 | 11.47 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.75 | 51.55 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.96 | 32.66 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.88 | 97.07 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement