Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTOX vs. CWGFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTOX is a Buy and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. AMTOX (764M). AMTOX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: AMTOX (6.16) vs CWGFX (1.30). AMTOX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: AMTOX (16 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). AMTOX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). AMTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTOX: CWGFX (250) vs AMTOX (5000). AMTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.33 vs. CWGFX (14.10). AMTOX return over 5 years is better than : 50.99 vs. CWGFX (31.04).
| AMTOX | CWGFX | AMTOX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.79 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.79 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.880 | 13.209 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 764M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.16 | 1.30 | 473% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 14.10 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.07 | 44.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.99 | 31.04 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.14 | 92.50 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers