Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTOX vs. CWGFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTOX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. AMTOX (763M). AMTOX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: AMTOX (5.91) vs CWGFX (1.30). AMTOX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: AMTOX (16 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). AMTOX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). AMTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTOX: CWGFX (250) vs AMTOX (5000). AMTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.18 vs. CWGFX (18.82). AMTOX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. CWGFX (31.85).
| AMTOX | CWGFX | AMTOX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.79 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.79 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.576 | 13.406 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 763M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.91 | 1.30 | 456% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.18 | 18.82 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.47 | 50.18 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.34 | 31.85 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.13 | 105.40 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement