Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts AMTOX vs CWGFX
AMTOX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTOX vs. CWGFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTOX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. AMTOX (779M). AMTOX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: AMTOX (5.95) vs CWGFX (1.31). AMTOX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: AMTOX (16 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). AMTOX (1.18) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). AMTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTOX: CWGFX (250) vs AMTOX (5000). AMTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.97 vs. CWGFX (15.55). AMTOX return over 5 years is better than : 52.87 vs. CWGFX (32.96).
| AMTOX | CWGFX | AMTOX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.79 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.79 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.211 | 13.986 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 779M | 158B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.95 | 1.31 | 453% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.97 | 15.55 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.71 | 43.96 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.87 | 32.96 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.41 | 93.69 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers