Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTOX vs RWIFX
AMTOX vs RWIFX Comparison
Open Charts AMTOX vs RWIFX
AMTOX vs RWIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTOX vs. RWIFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTOX is a Hold and RWIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. AMTOX (763M). AMTOX pays higher dividends than RWIFX: AMTOX (5.91) vs RWIFX (1.57). AMTOX was incepted earlier than RWIFX: AMTOX (16 years) vs RWIFX (24 years). AMTOX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RWIFX (0.46). AMTOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. RWIFX (44.00). RWIFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTOX: RWIFX (250) vs AMTOX (5000). AMTOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.22 vs. RWIFX (22.26). AMTOX return over 5 years is better than : 51.97 vs. RWIFX (37.12).
| AMTOX | RWIFX | AMTOX / RWIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.46 | 250% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.46 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.374 | 15.808 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 763M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.91 | 1.57 | 377% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.22 | 22.26 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.20 | 54.76 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.97 | 37.12 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.75 | 112.87 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement