Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMTZX vs CWGFX
AMTZX vs CWGFX Comparison
Open Charts AMTZX vs CWGFX
AMTZX vs CWGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMTZX vs. CWGFX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMTZX is a Hold and CWGFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. AMTZX (763M). AMTZX pays higher dividends than CWGFX: AMTZX (6.05) vs CWGFX (1.30). AMTZX was incepted earlier than CWGFX: AMTZX (12 years) vs CWGFX (25 years). AMTZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CWGFX (0.79). AMTZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CWGFX (44.00). CWGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMTZX: CWGFX (250) vs AMTZX (2000000). AMTZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.15 vs. CWGFX (21.38). AMTZX return over 5 years is better than : 57.55 vs. CWGFX (36.79).
| AMTZX | CWGFX | AMTZX / CWGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.79 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.79 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.541 | 15.681 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 250 | 800,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 763M | 160B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.05 | 1.30 | 467% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.15 | 21.38 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.22 | 44.61 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.55 | 36.79 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.97 | 101.79 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers