Ad is loading...
AMUB vs ATMP
AMUB vs ATMP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMUB vs. ATMP commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMUB is a Hold and ATMP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATMP has more net assets: 357M vs. AMUB (83.2M). AMUB has a higher annual dividend yield than ATMP: AMUB (12.760) vs ATMP (9.058). AMUB was incepted earlier than ATMP: AMUB (9 years) vs ATMP (12 years).
| AMUB | ATMP | AMUB / ATMP | |
| Gain YTD | 12.760 | 9.058 | 141% |
| Net Assets | 83.2M | 357M | 23% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | N/A | N/A | - |
| Yield | 5.92 | 5.10 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ATMP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HILDX | 19.13 | -0.11 | -0.57% |
| Hartford International Value F | |||
| GABBX | 17.57 | -0.15 | -0.85% |
| Gabelli Dividend Growth AAA | |||
| MDFSX | 7.87 | -0.10 | -1.25% |
| Manning & Napier Disciplined Value S | |||
| NBSRX | 49.91 | -0.79 | -1.56% |
| Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Inv | |||
| RSEIX | 14.44 | -0.25 | -1.70% |
| Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Instl | |||
AMUB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMUB and CQP have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMUB and CQP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUB | 100% | N/A | ||
| CQP - AMUB | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
| GEL - AMUB | 6% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
| USAC - AMUB | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
| VNOM - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.69% | ||
| ARLP - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
ATMP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ATMP has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ATMP jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ATMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMP | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| ET - ATMP | 81% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| PAGP - ATMP | 80% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| ENLC - ATMP | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PAA - ATMP | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| EPD - ATMP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||