CQP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 19 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMUB | CQP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMUB and AM have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMUB and AM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMUB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMUB | 100% | N/A | ||
| AM - AMUB | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| GEL - AMUB | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.50% | ||
| PAA - AMUB | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CQP - AMUB | 4% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
| MPLX - AMUB | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.