AMWL
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.21 (+1.64%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
221.11M
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
COIN
Price
$175.26
Change
+$2.98 (+1.73%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
46.24B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMWL vs COIN

AMWL vs COIN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMWL vs. COIN commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMWL is a StrongBuy and COIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($46.2B) has a higher market cap than AMWL($221M). AMWL YTD gains are higher at: 164.766 vs. COIN (-22.499). AMWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -41.9M vs. COIN (-901.23M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. AMWL (196M). AMWL has less debt than COIN: AMWL (2.98M) vs COIN (6.67B). COIN has higher revenues than AMWL: COIN (6.28B) vs AMWL (219M).
AMWLCOINAMWL / COIN
Capitalization221M46.2B0%
EBITDA-41.9M-901.23M5%
Gain YTD164.766-22.499-732%
P/E RatioN/A60.14-
Revenue219M6.28B3%
Total Cash196M9.02B2%
Total Debt2.98M6.67B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMWL: Fundamental Ratings
AMWL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMWLCOIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (AMWL: $13.00 vs. COIN: $175.26)
Brand notoriety: AMWL and COIN are both not notable
AMWL represents the Services to the Health Industry, while COIN is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMWL: 56% vs. COIN: 104%
Market capitalization -- AMWL: $221.11M vs. COIN: $46.24B
AMWL [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $221.11M. COIN’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $46.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $708 to $42.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $1.85M to $121.08B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.75B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $42.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMWL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while COIN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMWL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMWL is a better buy in the long-term than COIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while COIN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • COIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMWL and COIN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMWL (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.66%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMWL is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

COIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-3.12% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-4.24% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AMWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALAR1.920.14
+7.87%
Alarum Technologies Ltd
NFE0.33N/A
N/A
New Fortress Energy
NDAQ91.19-0.51
-0.56%
Nasdaq
VRTS147.41-4.41
-2.90%
Virtus Investment Partners
GDEV11.40-0.40
-3.39%
GDEV Inc

AMWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMWL has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMWL jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMWL
1D Price
Change %
AMWL100%
+1.64%
COIN - AMWL
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
CLSK - AMWL
54%
Loosely correlated
+6.80%
RIOT - AMWL
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
COMP - AMWL
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.75%
HOOD - AMWL
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
More