AMWL
Price
$11.01
Change
+$1.10 (+11.10%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
183.96M
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TROO
Price
$2.17
Change
+$0.10 (+4.83%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
265.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMWL vs TROO

AMWL vs TROO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMWL vs. TROO commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMWL is a Buy and TROO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (AMWL: $11.01 vs. TROO: $2.17)
Brand notoriety: AMWL and TROO are both not notable
AMWL represents the Services to the Health Industry, while TROO is part of the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMWL: 431% vs. TROO: 149%
Market capitalization -- AMWL: $183.96M vs. TROO: $265.09M
AMWL [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $183.96M. TROO’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $265.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $31.97B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $680.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.42B. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $33.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMWL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTROO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TROO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMWL is a better buy in the long-term than TROO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMWL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TROO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TROO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMWL is a better buy in the short-term than TROO.

Price Growth

AMWL (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +18.51% price change this week, while TROO (@Savings Banks) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMWL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-1.75% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Savings Banks (-3.70% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TROO($265M) has a higher market cap than AMWL($184M). AMWL YTD gains are higher at: 124.236 vs. TROO (-32.187). TROO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 319K vs. AMWL (-58.54M). AMWL has more cash in the bank: 179M vs. TROO (3.11M). TROO has less debt than AMWL: TROO (4K) vs AMWL (3.96M). AMWL has higher revenues than TROO: AMWL (237M) vs TROO (3.57M).
AMWLTROOAMWL / TROO
Capitalization184M265M69%
EBITDA-58.54M319K-18,350%
Gain YTD124.236-32.187-386%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue237M3.57M6,641%
Total Cash179M3.11M5,750%
Total Debt3.96M4K99,050%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TROO: Fundamental Ratings
TROO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
99
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMWLTROO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMWL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TROO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIXIX11.40N/A
N/A
Nationwide International Index R6
ADKSX39.03N/A
N/A
Adirondack Small Cap
DRGYX57.32N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Y
ACWEX21.40N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill World Energy & Power C
GAOFX21.65N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Global Allocation R4

AMWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMWL has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMWL jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMWL
1D Price
Change %
AMWL100%
+11.10%
COIN - AMWL
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.07%
CLSK - AMWL
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
RIOT - AMWL
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.70%
COMP - AMWL
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
HOOD - AMWL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
More