Advertisement
AMZN vs RECS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMZN is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMZN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- AMZN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMZN’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- AMZN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AMZN (@Internet Retail) experienced а +4.35% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +9.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +250.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMZN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Retail (+9.43% weekly)The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.
AMZN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 23 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMZN | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 58% | 8 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DRSK | 29.04 | 0.08 | +0.28% |
| Aptus Defined Risk ETF | |||
| TXXI | 49.51 | 0.07 | +0.15% |
| Bondbloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF | |||
| MMD | 14.60 | 0.01 | +0.07% |
| NYLI MacKay DefinedTerm Muni Opportunities Fund | |||
| XHYT | 34.93 | N/A | N/A |
| BondBloxx US HY Telecm Md Tech Sctr ETF | |||
| NSCR | 30.31 | N/A | N/A |
| Nuveen Sustainable Core ETF | |||
AMZN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMZN has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMZN jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMZN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| DASH - AMZN | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| GLBE - AMZN | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.33% | ||
| RVLV - AMZN | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| CVNA - AMZN | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.73% | ||
| JMIA - AMZN | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||