AMZN
Price
$232.81
Change
+$1.37 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.47T
2 days until earnings call
SBDS
Price
$17.24
Change
+$2.02 (+13.27%)
Updated
Jul 28, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMZN vs SBDS

Header iconAMZN vs SBDS Comparison
Open Charts AMZN vs SBDSBanner chart's image
Amazon.com
Price$232.81
Change+$1.37 (+0.59%)
Volume$245.21K
Capitalization2.47T
Solo Brands
Price$17.24
Change+$2.02 (+13.27%)
Volume$100
Capitalization27.56M
AMZN vs SBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMZN vs. SBDS commentary
Jul 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMZN is a Buy and SBDS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AMZN: $231.44 vs. SBDS: $15.22)
Brand notoriety: AMZN: Notable vs. SBDS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMZN: 76% vs. SBDS: 9%
Market capitalization -- AMZN: $2.47T vs. SBDS: $24.39M
AMZN [@Internet Retail] is valued at $2.47T. SBDS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $24.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.47T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $48.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMZN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMZN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMZN is a better buy in the long-term than SBDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMZN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBDS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMZN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBDS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMZN is a better buy in the short-term than SBDS.

Price Growth

AMZN (@Internet Retail) experienced а +2.35% price change this week, while SBDS (@Internet Retail) price change was -27.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +67.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMZN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+1.48% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMZN($2.47T) has a higher market cap than SBDS($27.6M). SBDS YTD gains are higher at: 1408.772 vs. AMZN (6.108).
AMZNSBDSAMZN / SBDS
Capitalization2.47T27.6M8,952,899%
EBITDA135BN/A-
Gain YTD6.1081408.7720%
P/E Ratio37.91N/A-
Revenue650BN/A-
Total Cash94.6BN/A-
Total Debt133BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMZN: Fundamental Ratings
AMZN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMZNSBDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTMD4.370.05
+1.16%
Biote Corp
KMB126.86-0.52
-0.41%
Kimberly-Clark Corp
CPIX3.48-0.04
-1.00%
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals
NJR45.44-0.52
-1.13%
New Jersey Resources Corp
SSRM12.21-0.27
-2.16%
SSR Mining

AMZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMZN has been loosely correlated with W. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMZN jumps, then W could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMZN
1D Price
Change %
AMZN100%
+0.58%
W - AMZN
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.81%
GLBE - AMZN
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
DASH - AMZN
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
SE - AMZN
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
RVLV - AMZN
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
More

SBDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBDS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBDS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBDS
1D Price
Change %
SBDS100%
+13.01%
CVNA - SBDS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
W - SBDS
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
AMZN - SBDS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
RVLV - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
QVCGA - SBDS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
More