AMZN
Price
$222.69
Change
+$0.14 (+0.06%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.38T
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBDS
Price
$9.00
Change
-$0.20 (-2.17%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMZN vs SBDS

Header iconAMZN vs SBDS Comparison
Open Charts AMZN vs SBDSBanner chart's image
Amazon.com
Price$222.69
Change+$0.14 (+0.06%)
Volume$58.34M
Capitalization2.38T
Solo Brands
Price$9.00
Change-$0.20 (-2.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.7M
AMZN vs SBDS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMZN vs. SBDS commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMZN is a Hold and SBDS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (AMZN: $222.69 vs. SBDS: $8.92)
Brand notoriety: AMZN: Notable vs. SBDS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMZN: 113% vs. SBDS: 178%
Market capitalization -- AMZN: $2.38T vs. SBDS: $14.7M
AMZN [@Internet Retail] is valued at $2.38T. SBDS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $14.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.38T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $52.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMZN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMZN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMZN is a better buy in the long-term than SBDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMZN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMZN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SBDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBDS is a better buy in the short-term than AMZN.

Price Growth

AMZN (@Internet Retail) experienced а -8.81% price change this week, while SBDS (@Internet Retail) price change was -25.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +163.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMZN is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-3.48% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMZN($2.38T) has a higher market cap than SBDS($14.7M). SBDS YTD gains are higher at: 682.456 vs. AMZN (1.504). AMZN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 157B vs. SBDS (-166.65M). AMZN has more cash in the bank: 94.2B vs. SBDS (18.1M). SBDS has less debt than AMZN: SBDS (265M) vs AMZN (135B). AMZN has higher revenues than SBDS: AMZN (691B) vs SBDS (407M).
AMZNSBDSAMZN / SBDS
Capitalization2.38T14.7M16,197,279%
EBITDA157B-166.65M-94,207%
Gain YTD1.504682.4560%
P/E Ratio31.45N/A-
Revenue691B407M169,779%
Total Cash94.2B18.1M520,442%
Total Debt135B265M50,943%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMZN: Fundamental Ratings
AMZN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMZNSBDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMZN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QULL52.660.41
+0.79%
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN
SPLG80.00N/A
N/A
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
OACP23.06-0.01
-0.04%
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
CAFX25.04-0.01
-0.04%
Congress Intermediate Bond ETF
APCB29.79-0.02
-0.08%
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF

SBDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBDS has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBDS jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBDS
1D Price
Change %
SBDS100%
-3.04%
CVNA - SBDS
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.95%
W - SBDS
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
AMZN - SBDS
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
RVLV - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.06%
MOGU - SBDS
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More