AN
Price
$167.43
Change
+$3.31 (+2.02%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.9B
14 days until earnings call
CDNAF
Price
$105.16
Change
+$1.12 (+1.08%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
8B
Ad is loading...

AN vs CDNAF

Header iconAN vs CDNAF Comparison
Open Charts AN vs CDNAFBanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$167.43
Change+$3.31 (+2.02%)
Volume$394.44K
Capitalization6.9B
Canadian Tire
Price$105.16
Change+$1.12 (+1.08%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization8B
AN vs CDNAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AN vs. CDNAF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a StrongBuy and CDNAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (AN: $167.43 vs. CDNAF: $105.16)
Brand notoriety: AN and CDNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 76% vs. CDNAF: 5%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.9B vs. CDNAF: $8B
AN [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.9B. CDNAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the short-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

AN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-0.25% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($8B) has a higher market cap than AN($6.9B). CDNAF has higher P/E ratio than AN: CDNAF (12.22) vs AN (7.25). CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 0.248 vs. AN (-1.419). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. AN (1.9B). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. AN (60.8M). AN (8.03B) and CDNAF (8.38B) have identical debt. AN has higher revenues than CDNAF: AN (26.9B) vs CDNAF (17.7B).
ANCDNAFAN / CDNAF
Capitalization6.9B8B86%
EBITDA1.9B2.22B85%
Gain YTD-1.4190.248-571%
P/E Ratio7.2512.2259%
Revenue26.9B17.7B152%
Total Cash60.8M489M12%
Total Debt8.03B8.38B96%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
AN
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1133
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1184
SMR RATING
1..100
3255
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (74) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNAF (84) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (32) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (55) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as AN (74) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNAF (97) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANCDNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPWYX13.470.09
+0.67%
American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Y
VISAX19.77N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR International Small-Mid Cap A
PRUFX95.89N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I
JOPSX12.99N/A
N/A
JOHCM International Opps Institutional
SMISX25.90N/A
N/A
Invesco Summit R6

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+1.08%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
More