AN
Price
$219.84
Change
-$2.50 (-1.12%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:52 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.38B
56 days until earnings call
CDNAF
Price
$124.23
Change
-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
6.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs CDNAF

Header iconAN vs CDNAF Comparison
Open Charts AN vs CDNAFBanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$219.84
Change-$2.50 (-1.12%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.38B
Canadian Tire
Price$124.23
Change-$0.27 (-0.22%)
Volume$7.7K
Capitalization6.86B
AN vs CDNAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AN vs. CDNAF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Buy and CDNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AN: $222.34 vs. CDNAF: $124.23)
Brand notoriety: AN and CDNAF are both not notable
AN represents the Automotive Aftermarket, while CDNAF is part of the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 73% vs. CDNAF: 8%
Market capitalization -- AN: $8.38B vs. CDNAF: $6.86B
AN [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $8.38B. CDNAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $52.11B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $47.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDNAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AN and CDNAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +5.72% price change this week, while CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.68% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

@Specialty Stores (+0.72% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($8.38B) has a higher market cap than CDNAF($6.86B). AN has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: AN (13.94) vs CDNAF (11.72). AN YTD gains are higher at: 30.911 vs. CDNAF (18.427). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.03B vs. AN (1.57B). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. AN (62.9M). CDNAF has less debt than AN: CDNAF (7.62B) vs AN (9.31B). AN has higher revenues than CDNAF: AN (27.5B) vs CDNAF (16.7B).
ANCDNAFAN / CDNAF
Capitalization8.38B6.86B122%
EBITDA1.57B2.03B77%
Gain YTD30.91118.427168%
P/E Ratio13.9411.72119%
Revenue27.5B16.7B165%
Total Cash62.9M1.19B5%
Total Debt9.31B7.62B122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
AN
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2357
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
970
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AN (82) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDNAF (70) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (100) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (57) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (100) in the null industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANCDNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWET12.630.19
+1.53%
Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF
QCJL22.970.07
+0.30%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jul
DFGX53.490.07
+0.13%
Dimensional Global ex US Cor Fxd Inc ETF
CAMX31.71N/A
N/A
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
BUSA34.67-0.05
-0.14%
Brandes U.S. Value ETF

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
-0.22%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More