This stock comparison examines AN and RUSHA, two prominent players in the auto dealership sector. Investors and traders interested in consumer cyclical stocks, particularly those exposed to automotive retail trends, may find value in understanding their relative performance. Amid fluctuating vehicle demand, supply chain dynamics, and economic shifts, comparing their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning offers insights into sector opportunities and risks. This analysis draws on verifiable data to highlight contrasts for informed decision-making.
AutoNation, Inc. (AN) is the largest automotive retailer in the United States, operating through segments including domestic, import, premium luxury vehicles, and finance services. It sells new and used vehicles, provides parts, repair, maintenance, and collision services, and offers financing and insurance products. Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the company serves metropolitan Sunbelt markets.
In recent market activity, AN shares have shown resilience, posting modest YTD gains of 1.5% and 26.4% over the past year. Trading around $210 with a market cap of $7.3 billion, the stock recently surged alongside peers like Penske Automotive amid positive industry outlooks. Strong Q4 results, with revenue of $6.93 billion and EPS (earnings per share) of $5.08 beating estimates, have bolstered sentiment. Factors influencing performance include steady used-car sales and collision repair growth, though high debt levels and softer new-car volumes have tempered gains. Analyst targets average $237, signaling potential upside.
Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles, including Peterbilt and International trucks, and related services like parts, maintenance, and leasing. Operating over 150 locations across 23 U.S. states, it focuses on medium- and heavy-duty trucks for industries like construction and logistics.
Recent weeks have highlighted RUSHA's robust momentum, with YTD returns near 39.5% and 47% over the past year, outpacing benchmarks. Shares trade around $75, reflecting strong demand for commercial vehicles amid infrastructure and freight recovery. Performance benefits from aftermarket services growth and fleet expansions, with solid profitability driving investor interest. While specific quarterly details are limited, the stock's beta and outperformance versus the S&P 500 underscore its cyclical strength. Market sentiment remains positive, supported by sector tailwinds.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features the top 25 performers curated from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and technical analysis (TA) on timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 168%, win rates of 54-88%, profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 22. Examples cover industrials, semiconductors, and energy sectors, with multi-agent setups trading 3-18 tickers. Virtual Agents offer risk-managed copy trading, while Signal Agents provide real-time alerts. This curated selection highlights bots best suited to current volatility. Traders can explore these high performers to enhance strategies.
AN and RUSHA share sector exposure in auto dealerships but diverge in focus: AN’s broad passenger vehicle retail contrasts RUSHA’s niche in commercial trucks, offering diversification trade-offs. Growth drivers differ—AN leverages scale in used cars and services, while RUSHA benefits from infrastructure spending.
Recent momentum favors RUSHA with superior YTD and 1-year gains, though AN shows short-term spikes. Risk profiles vary: AN’s higher debt (436% debt-to-equity) versus RUSHA’s lower beta stability. Market sentiment tilts toward RUSHA for consistency, but AN’s size provides liquidity advantages.
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor RUSHA in the current environment due to its stronger trend consistency, superior YTD and multi-year returns, and positioning in resilient commercial vehicle demand. While AN offers value at lower multiples and recent catalysts, RUSHA’s relative outperformance and stability edge it probabilistically for momentum-focused strategies.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.65%.
AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| AN | RUSHA | AN / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 6.38B | 5.85B | 109% |
| EBITDA | 1.64B | 640M | 255% |
| Gain YTD | -7.633 | 36.347 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.21 | 21.33 | 48% |
| Revenue | 27.5B | 7.27B | 378% |
| Total Cash | 65.5M | 240M | 27% |
| Total Debt | 10.5B | 1.44B | 731% |
AN | RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (14) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (68) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (27) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (70) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (65) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.
| AN | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 12 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 51% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LDO.X | 0.280969 | 0.006938 | +2.53% |
| Lido DAO cryptocurrency | |||
| VTHO.X | 0.000379 | 0.000005 | +1.42% |
| VeThor Token cryptocurrency | |||
| SYS.X | 0.002502 | 0.000027 | +1.09% |
| Syscoin cryptocurrency | |||
| DODO.X | 0.016935 | -0.000067 | -0.39% |
| DODO cryptocurrency | |||
| TSRS | 27.86 | -0.21 | -0.74% |
| Truth Social American Red State REITsETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | N/A | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ONEW - RUSHA | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HVT - RUSHA | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| HZO - RUSHA | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| WSM - RUSHA | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||