AN
Price
$190.72
Change
+$4.31 (+2.31%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUSHA
Price
$74.52
Change
+$1.36 (+1.86%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs RUSHA

AN vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AutoNation, Inc. (AN) vs. Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • RUSHA has significantly outperformed AN year-to-date (YTD, or year-to-date), with returns of approximately 39.5% compared to 1.5%.
  • Both stocks operate in the auto and truck dealerships industry within the consumer cyclical sector, but AN focuses on passenger vehicles while RUSHA specializes in commercial vehicles.
  • AN boasts a larger market capitalization of about $7.3 billion, reflecting its broader retail footprint.
  • Recent market activity has seen AN shares surge amid positive sector mentions, though momentum favors RUSHA over longer periods.
  • Valuation metrics show AN trading at a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of 12.3, indicating relative affordability.
  • Analyst price targets suggest upside potential for both, with AN at around $237.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines AN and RUSHA, two prominent players in the auto dealership sector. Investors and traders interested in consumer cyclical stocks, particularly those exposed to automotive retail trends, may find value in understanding their relative performance. Amid fluctuating vehicle demand, supply chain dynamics, and economic shifts, comparing their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning offers insights into sector opportunities and risks. This analysis draws on verifiable data to highlight contrasts for informed decision-making.

AN Overview and Recent Performance

AutoNation, Inc. (AN) is the largest automotive retailer in the United States, operating through segments including domestic, import, premium luxury vehicles, and finance services. It sells new and used vehicles, provides parts, repair, maintenance, and collision services, and offers financing and insurance products. Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the company serves metropolitan Sunbelt markets.

In recent market activity, AN shares have shown resilience, posting modest YTD gains of 1.5% and 26.4% over the past year. Trading around $210 with a market cap of $7.3 billion, the stock recently surged alongside peers like Penske Automotive amid positive industry outlooks. Strong Q4 results, with revenue of $6.93 billion and EPS (earnings per share) of $5.08 beating estimates, have bolstered sentiment. Factors influencing performance include steady used-car sales and collision repair growth, though high debt levels and softer new-car volumes have tempered gains. Analyst targets average $237, signaling potential upside.

RUSHA Overview and Recent Performance

Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) is an integrated retailer of commercial vehicles, including Peterbilt and International trucks, and related services like parts, maintenance, and leasing. Operating over 150 locations across 23 U.S. states, it focuses on medium- and heavy-duty trucks for industries like construction and logistics.

Recent weeks have highlighted RUSHA's robust momentum, with YTD returns near 39.5% and 47% over the past year, outpacing benchmarks. Shares trade around $75, reflecting strong demand for commercial vehicles amid infrastructure and freight recovery. Performance benefits from aftermarket services growth and fleet expansions, with solid profitability driving investor interest. While specific quarterly details are limited, the stock's beta and outperformance versus the S&P 500 underscore its cyclical strength. Market sentiment remains positive, supported by sector tailwinds.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features the top 25 performers curated from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, and technical analysis (TA) on timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 168%, win rates of 54-88%, profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 22. Examples cover industrials, semiconductors, and energy sectors, with multi-agent setups trading 3-18 tickers. Virtual Agents offer risk-managed copy trading, while Signal Agents provide real-time alerts. This curated selection highlights bots best suited to current volatility. Traders can explore these high performers to enhance strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AN and RUSHA share sector exposure in auto dealerships but diverge in focus: AN’s broad passenger vehicle retail contrasts RUSHA’s niche in commercial trucks, offering diversification trade-offs. Growth drivers differ—AN leverages scale in used cars and services, while RUSHA benefits from infrastructure spending.

Recent momentum favors RUSHA with superior YTD and 1-year gains, though AN shows short-term spikes. Risk profiles vary: AN’s higher debt (436% debt-to-equity) versus RUSHA’s lower beta stability. Market sentiment tilts toward RUSHA for consistency, but AN’s size provides liquidity advantages.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor RUSHA in the current environment due to its stronger trend consistency, superior YTD and multi-year returns, and positioning in resilient commercial vehicle demand. While AN offers value at lower multiples and recent catalysts, RUSHA’s relative outperformance and stability edge it probabilistically for momentum-focused strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
AN vs. RUSHA commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a StrongBuy and RUSHA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2026
Stock price -- (AN: $190.72 vs. RUSHA: $73.16)
Brand notoriety: AN and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 113% vs. RUSHA: 36%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.38B vs. RUSHA: $5.85B
AN [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $6.38B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $5.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $50.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than AN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than AN.

Price Growth

AN (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (-1.21% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($6.38B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($5.85B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than AN: RUSHA (21.33) vs AN (10.21). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 36.347 vs. AN (-7.633). AN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.64B vs. RUSHA (640M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. AN (65.5M). RUSHA has less debt than AN: RUSHA (1.44B) vs AN (10.5B). AN has higher revenues than RUSHA: AN (27.5B) vs RUSHA (7.27B).
ANRUSHAAN / RUSHA
Capitalization6.38B5.85B109%
EBITDA1.64B640M255%
Gain YTD-7.63336.347-21%
P/E Ratio10.2121.3348%
Revenue27.5B7.27B378%
Total Cash65.5M240M27%
Total Debt10.5B1.44B731%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
AN
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2715
SMR RATING
1..100
3466
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (14) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (68) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (27) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as AN (70) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (65) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDO.X0.2809690.006938
+2.53%
Lido DAO cryptocurrency
VTHO.X0.0003790.000005
+1.42%
VeThor Token cryptocurrency
SYS.X0.0025020.000027
+1.09%
Syscoin cryptocurrency
DODO.X0.016935-0.000067
-0.39%
DODO cryptocurrency
TSRS27.86-0.21
-0.74%
Truth Social American Red State REITsETF

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
+2.31%
PAG - AN
79%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
ABG - AN
77%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
GPI - AN
77%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
LAD - AN
72%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
SAH - AN
71%
Closely correlated
+2.60%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
N/A
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
ONEW - RUSHA
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HVT - RUSHA
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
HZO - RUSHA
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
WSM - RUSHA
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
More