AN
Price
$199.92
Change
-$1.11 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.9B
21 days until earnings call
RUSHA
Price
$50.74
Change
-$0.65 (-1.26%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AN vs RUSHA

Header iconAN vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts AN vs RUSHABanner chart's image
AutoNation
Price$199.92
Change-$1.11 (-0.55%)
Volume$233.16K
Capitalization6.9B
Rush Enterprises
Price$50.74
Change-$0.65 (-1.26%)
Volume$384.93K
Capitalization4.12B
AN vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AN vs. RUSHA commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AN is a Buy and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AN: $199.92 vs. RUSHA: $50.74)
Brand notoriety: AN and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AN: 54% vs. RUSHA: 84%
Market capitalization -- AN: $6.9B vs. RUSHA: $4.12B
AN [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $6.9B. RUSHA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $4.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, AN is a better buy in the long-term than RUSHA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than AN.

Price Growth

AN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +3.63% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

AN is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.00% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AN($6.9B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.12B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than AN: RUSHA (12.75) vs AN (7.25). AN YTD gains are higher at: 17.711 vs. RUSHA (-6.757). AN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.9B vs. RUSHA (737M). RUSHA has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. AN (60.8M). RUSHA has less debt than AN: RUSHA (1.81B) vs AN (8.03B). AN has higher revenues than RUSHA: AN (26.9B) vs RUSHA (7.93B).
ANRUSHAAN / RUSHA
Capitalization6.9B4.12B168%
EBITDA1.9B737M257%
Gain YTD17.711-6.757-262%
P/E Ratio7.2512.7557%
Revenue26.9B7.93B339%
Total Cash60.8M184M33%
Total Debt8.03B1.81B444%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AN vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
AN
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2218
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
817
SMR RATING
1..100
3456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4354
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AN (73) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AN’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

AN's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (56) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

AN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (54) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

AN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (20) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IIF27.760.20
+0.73%
Morgan Stanley India Investment Fund
CLOZ26.800.01
+0.04%
Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF
QQQD15.97-0.04
-0.26%
Direxion Daily Concentrated Qs Bear 1X Shares
BLES40.40-0.28
-0.69%
Inspire Global Hope ETF
FSEC43.00-0.47
-1.08%
Fidelity Investment Grade Sec ETF

AN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AN
1D Price
Change %
AN100%
-0.55%
ABG - AN
83%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
GPI - AN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
PAG - AN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.80%
SAH - AN
79%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
LAD - AN
76%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
-1.26%
RUSHB - RUSHA
86%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
LAD - RUSHA
69%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
ABG - RUSHA
68%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
AN - RUSHA
67%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
PAG - RUSHA
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
More