ANCTF
Price
$50.34
Change
-$0.10 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
49.19B
68 days until earnings call
FLWS
Price
$5.15
Change
+$0.23 (+4.67%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANCTF vs FLWS

Header iconANCTF vs FLWS Comparison
Open Charts ANCTF vs FLWSBanner chart's image
Alimentation Couche-Tard
Price$50.34
Change-$0.10 (-0.20%)
Volume$9.26K
Capitalization49.19B
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$5.15
Change+$0.23 (+4.67%)
Volume$464.39K
Capitalization698.5M
ANCTF vs FLWS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ANCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANCTF vs. FLWS commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANCTF is a Hold and FLWS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ANCTF: $50.38 vs. FLWS: $5.15)
Brand notoriety: ANCTF: Not notable vs. FLWS: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANCTF: 99% vs. FLWS: 72%
Market capitalization -- ANCTF: $49.19B vs. FLWS: $698.5M
ANCTF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $49.19B. FLWS’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $698.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANCTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ANCTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANCTF is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANCTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLWS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANCTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLWS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLWS is a better buy in the short-term than ANCTF.

Price Growth

ANCTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -3.51% price change this week, while FLWS (@Specialty Stores) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

ANCTF is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.15% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANCTF($49.2B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than ANCTF: FLWS (156.25) vs ANCTF (16.42). ANCTF YTD gains are higher at: -9.358 vs. FLWS (-36.965). ANCTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.82B vs. FLWS (1.43M). ANCTF has more cash in the bank: 929M vs. FLWS (312M). FLWS has less debt than ANCTF: FLWS (318M) vs ANCTF (9.47B). ANCTF has higher revenues than FLWS: ANCTF (71.9B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
ANCTFFLWSANCTF / FLWS
Capitalization49.2B699M7,039%
EBITDA5.82B1.43M405,509%
Gain YTD-9.358-36.96525%
P/E Ratio16.42156.2511%
Revenue71.9B1.91B3,770%
Total Cash929M312M298%
Total Debt9.47B318M2,977%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANCTF vs FLWS: Fundamental Ratings
ANCTF
FLWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5385
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
4797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5964
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANCTF's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FLWS (85) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

ANCTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

ANCTF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (97) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

ANCTF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FLWS (64) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANCTF (64) in the null industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANCTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANCTFFLWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHSSX66.08N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Instl
RYMQX24.26N/A
N/A
Guggenheim Multi-Hedge Strategies A
VNSAX22.41N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select A
GCIFX15.35N/A
N/A
Green Century MSCI Intl Indx Instl
ATEZX150.66N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Global Thematic Z

ANCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANCTF and WFAFY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANCTF and WFAFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANCTF
1D Price
Change %
ANCTF100%
-0.10%
WFAFY - ANCTF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
FLWS - ANCTF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
CASY - ANCTF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
WOOF - ANCTF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
PAG - ANCTF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+4.67%
RH - FLWS
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.26%
RUSHA - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
PAG - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
GPI - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
DKS - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+5.50%
More