Advertisement
CPRT vs FLWS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPRT is a Hold and FLWS is a Hold.
| CPRT | FLWS | CPRT / FLWS | |
| Capitalization | 28.5B | 196M | 14,541% |
| EBITDA | 1.92B | -64.19M | -2,989% |
| Gain YTD | -21.277 | -21.883 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.88 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 1.5B | 308% |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 11.4M | 36,842% |
| Total Debt | 93.1M | 249M | 37% |
CPRT | FLWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 83 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPRT's Valuation (77) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FLWS (78) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that CPRT’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
CPRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that CPRT’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
CPRT's SMR Rating (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (98) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that CPRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
CPRT's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FLWS (83) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that CPRT’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.
FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPRT (81) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew significantly faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
| CPRT | FLWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | 6 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while FLWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CPRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPRT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLWS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CPRT (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while FLWS (@Specialty Stores) price change was -15.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.46%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPRT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
FLWS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.07% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Specialty Stores (-3.93% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
Advertisement
FLWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RUSHA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RUSHA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLWS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| RUSHA - FLWS | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| HVT - FLWS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| LOW - FLWS | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| CPRT - FLWS | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| FND - FLWS | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.20% | ||
More | ||||